Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Backup\s+limited\s+to\s+10\%\s+of\s+network\s+speed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Backup\s+limited\s+to\s+10\%\s+of\s+network\s+speed\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Backup limited to 10% of network speed (score: 1): Author: Simone Martina <smartina AT noc.skylogicnet DOT com>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:24:14 +0200; Hi at all, I've noticed that our backup system keeps much time to finish servers' backup. Monitoring our 100Mbps net, by cacti, I see that backup speed run at 1MBps, at least, meanwhile on another 10; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-09/msg00186.html (12,514 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Backup limited to 10% of network speed (score: 1): Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:43:26 -0400; No. Bacula does not throttle bandwidth. Are you using spooling? Do you have millions of small files? Are the source disks highly fragmented? Are we talking about full backups because any other level; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-09/msg00188.html (12,504 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] Backup limited to 10% of network speed (score: 1): Author: Simone Martina <smartina AT noc.skylogicnet DOT com>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:21:01 +0200; Hi John, no, we have a vanilla installation of Bacula 5, we have not configure any spooling system and we don't use accurate option. Anyway we got heterogeneous behaviour between different server, so; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-09/msg00189.html (12,797 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]