Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Antw\.\:\s+Re\:\s+question\s+about\s+schedules\s+and\,\s+retentions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Antw\.\:\s+Re\:\s+question\s+about\s+schedules\s+and\,\s+retentions\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Bacula-users] Antw.: Re: question about schedules and, retentions (score: 1): Author: Bob Hetzel <beh AT case DOT edu>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:53:14 -0500; If I could chime in here... different retention times for incrementals and fulls sounds reasonable on it's face, but IMHO is likely to bite you eventually... what you're doing with this technique is; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00311.html (14,197 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Antw.: Re: question about schedules and, retentions (score: 1): Author: Kevin Keane <subscription AT kkeane DOT com>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:22:39 -0800; What you describe can be a very valid point - but it's something you wouldn't want to address with a backup system in the first place. If you need access to every single change to a file, ever, you n; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00313.html (15,174 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]