Author: "James Harper" <james.harper AT bendigoit.com DOT au>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:25:54 +1100
And thank you Kern! James -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do bes
The online documentation is available in two forms: The dev version The released version I disagree with your conclusion regarding who is running what. I think most people use whatever is released, n
Yes, it can be downloaded anytime, but I am suggesting that a version number tag could be added to the documentation while the new features are added to the documentation, so it does not take lots of
It is a good idea. I know it has been done sometimes. The documentation project could always use additional resources to ensure such things are always done. -- Dan Langille http://langille.org/ -- Th
Adding a tag in the left margin is too hard to get correct and means a lot of maintenance at least at this point with the limited manpower we have. However, we hope to soon have multiple versions of
Yes, I would too, and it is a planned project. The bottleneck is probably me since several people have offered to help, but with the new professional services effort, I am running at 150% so certain
If you look at the very first page of the document, there is a version tag as well as the document date. Maybe you want more than that, but at least it is there ... -- This SF.Net email is sponsored
I am not sure how the manual is generated, maybe adding version in paranthesis after the option would be easy: e.g. IgnoreDir (V3.0.0) This way you only have to maintain one manual and if someone is
I am sorry, but we are not going to do it that way because of the amount of work involved, and the "messiness" it would cause. I am sorry, I just don't have the time to go into a detailed explanation
Hello, It is not too late to change the name of the directive, but I would like to see some discussion/input on this. Although I don't have any strong attachment to "Ignore Dir", I think I personally
In general, we maintain only the manual about to be released. We don't change manuals from previous releases. There are ReleaseNotes with each release. That is what you should be reading. Surely you
Author: Ulrich Leodolter <ulrich.leodolter AT obvsg DOT at>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:13:07 +0200
Hello, A nice feature would be if wild, wildir, wildfile strings can be read from client file. Exclude { Client Wild = .bacula_exclude } /some/dir/on/client/.bacula_exclude: .svn *.iso If its not too
It is never too late, but yes, it *probably* is too late for the next release because the developers are not adding new features, so any such change would need to be contributed code. The best way to
Author: Troy Daniels <troy.daniels AT itouch.com DOT au>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:22:51 +0800
Hi, Not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere (been offline for a week or so, so am still catching up on my emails :) ) I found 'IgnoreDir' to be non intuitive - Looking at it, it initially struc
Yes. Thanks for your comments. Regards, Kern -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great pri
Author: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:04:39 +0100
If it hasn't been done already, it could be useful to consider how this affects the mental model that users have of the include/exclude algorithm (which is already a source of some difficulty). This
Author: Marc Schiffbauer <marc AT schiffbauer DOT net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:59:48 +0200
* Martin Simmons schrieb am 06.10.08 um 22:04 Uhr: Look a bit closer. Its not within the Options section. Currently its in the Include section. I voted for putting it into the Exclude section because
I personally don't find it that confusing, but am willing to admit that some would. So, what is the solution? Drop the feature? Change the feature? If it involves programming, please realize that thi
Author: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:00:03 +0100
Ah, sorry, you are right about the config file parsing. However, the implementation stores it in the Options structure and findlib reads it from there too. I think that makes it associate with the o
Author: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:23:33 +0100
Putting it outside the Include option and making it truely apply to the whole fileset would at least make it easier to define what it does. I think the fileset syntax needs a complete overhaul. The