Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+serial\s+or\s+parallel\s+backups\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+serial\s+or\s+parallel\s+backups\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] serial or parallel backups (score: 1): Author: Chris Baker <cbaker AT intera DOT com>; Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:48:20 -0500; I have been wondering about this for a while. Am I better off having backups run parallel or in series? By running in series, I mean one backup runs at a time. When it finishes, another one starts. B; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2011-06/msg00169.html (13,178 bytes)
2. Re: [BackupPC-users] serial or parallel backups (score: 1): Author: Steve <leperas AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:08:12 -0400; I just depends on any particular setup, and what the most limiting factor is. Sound like for you it's bandwidth, but that may not always be true, even for you, depending on how much your data changes; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2011-06/msg00170.html (15,363 bytes)
3. Re: [BackupPC-users] serial or parallel backups (score: 1): Author: John Rouillard <rouilj-backuppc AT renesys DOT com>; Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:33:42 +0000; It depends on a few things. I use rsync almost exclusively. So YMMV with other backup mechanisms. What is your i/o subsystem? I have a striped array (raid 0) over two raid 6 arrays with 7 drives in e; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2011-06/msg00171.html (16,974 bytes)
4. Re: [BackupPC-users] serial or parallel backups (score: 1): Author: Dan Pritts <danno AT internet2 DOT edu>; Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:40:56 -0400; I'm sure that John knows this, but for the benefit of the OP i'll note that it's a lot more complicated than that, of course. For small writes I might say that you effectively have 2 spindles, and s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2011-06/msg00178.html (14,293 bytes)
5. Re: [BackupPC-users] serial or parallel backups (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:59:44 -0500; One other point that I don't think has been mentioned yet is that if you have configured only one concurrent backup, something that slows down a single host like a big upgrade or set of new files to; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2011-06/msg00179.html (13,410 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]