Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+hardware\s+and\s+configuration\s+recommendations\s+for\s+speed\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+hardware\s+and\s+configuration\s+recommendations\s+for\s+speed\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] hardware and configuration recommendations for speed? (score: 1): Author: Frank J. Gómez <frank AT crop-circle DOT net>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:28:48 -0400; Hello, I've just gotten authorization to build a new back up solution for a client, and I was hoping for some suggestions from the list. To summarize, I guess I'm looking for the answers to three qu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00256.html (15,550 bytes)
2. Re: [BackupPC-users] hardware and configuration recommendations for speed? (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:13:54 -0500; Is that the initial or 2nd run with this batch of files? The 3rd and subsequent runs should be faster if you have enabled checksum caching. Or is that a typical amount of change between backups? Cons; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00258.html (15,893 bytes)
3. Re: [BackupPC-users] hardware and configuration recommendations for speed? (score: 1): Author: "Jeffrey J. Kosowsky" <backuppc AT kosowsky DOT org>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:51:30 -0400; Frank J. Gómez wrote at about 13:28:48 -0400 on Tuesday, May 25, 2010: I wonder whether there is something wrong with your setup, particularly on the Windows machine. I backup a WinXP Home partition; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00264.html (15,322 bytes)
4. Re: [BackupPC-users] hardware and configuration recommendations for speed? (score: 1): Author: Frank J. Gómez <frank AT crop-circle DOT net>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 15:20:12 -0400; Thanks for your response, Jeffrey. I wonder whether there is something wrong with your setup, particularly on the Windows machine. I'm open to that possibility, though I'm not sure where to begin t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00269.html (15,455 bytes)
5. Re: [BackupPC-users] hardware and configuration recommendations for speed? (score: 1): Author: Frank J. Gómez <frank AT crop-circle DOT net>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:59:41 -0400; Is that the initial or 2nd run with this batch of files? The 3rd and subsequent runs should be faster if you have enabled checksum caching. Or is that a typical amount of change between backups? It; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00272.html (17,292 bytes)
6. Re: [BackupPC-users] hardware and configuration recommendations for speed? (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:17:10 -0500; That could be a local problem on the target. The difference is that incremental runs only look at the directory entries if the timestamp and length match the copy in the previous full (or incremental; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00276.html (15,617 bytes)
7. Re: [BackupPC-users] hardware and configuration recommendations for speed? (score: 1): Author: "Jeffrey J. Kosowsky" <backuppc AT kosowsky DOT org>; Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 00:23:40 -0400; Frank J. Gómez wrote at about 15:20:12 -0400 on Tuesday, May 25, 2010: There is nothing intrinsic about Windows XP Home, cygwin/rsyncd (especially with cygwin 1.7), and BackupPC that should be causin; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00284.html (14,892 bytes)
8. Re: [BackupPC-users] hardware and configuration recommendations for speed? (score: 1): Author: Frank J. Gómez <frank AT crop-circle DOT net>; Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:58:55 -0400; There is nothing intrinsic about Windows XP Home, cygwin/rsyncd (especially with cygwin 1.7), and BackupPC that should be causing your backups to be significantly worse than backing up a Linux system; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00291.html (14,912 bytes)
9. Re: [BackupPC-users] hardware and configuration recommendations for speed? (score: 1): Author: Kim Pedersen <kim AT cncsltd DOT com>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 01:18:25 -0400; Hi Frank, Before going out shopping for hardware, I'd try and determine where your performance problem is, ie on the server (due to external USB based storage), or on the client. It does seem to me t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00324.html (17,445 bytes)
10. Re: [BackupPC-users] hardware and configuration recommendations for speed? (score: 1): Author: Frank J. Gómez <frank AT crop-circle DOT net>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:20:55 -0400; Thanks for writing, Kim. Before going out shopping for hardware, I'd try and determine where your performance problem is, ie on the server (due to external USB based storage), or on the client. A goo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-05/msg00327.html (16,348 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]