Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+catch\s+up\s+hump\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+catch\s+up\s+hump\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] catch up hump (score: 1): Author: James Ward <jeward AT torzo DOT com>; Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:22:28 -0700 (MST); My busiest BackupPC server fell very behind before I did some tuning (thanks for your help!) after I upgraded it from 2.x to 3.x due to disk contention between the nightly admin jobs and backups (whi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-09/msg00430.html (12,130 bytes)
2. Re: [BackupPC-users] catch up hump (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:50:34 -0500; That would depend on the pattern of data change. If a lot of files are changing the incrementals will keep getting bigger. If there's not a lot of activity, it won't hurt to have longer full interval; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-09/msg00432.html (12,399 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]