Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+backuppc\s+4\:\s+rsync\s+error\:\s+unexplained\s+error\s+$code\s+255$\s+at\s+io\.c$629$\s+\[Receiver\=3\.0\.9\.8\]\)\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+backuppc\s+4\:\s+rsync\s+error\:\s+unexplained\s+error\s+$code\s+255$\s+at\s+io\.c$629$\s+\[Receiver\=3\.0\.9\.8\]\)\s*$/: 19998 ]

Total 19998 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] Blackout period not working? (score: 1): Author: Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu AT orgfarm.uu DOT se>; Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:16:56 +0000; Hi all, I just noticed that one of our BPC-servers started a full backup at about 0900 hrs despite its blackout period was set as follows: hourBegin 8 hourEnd 18 weekDays 1,2,3,4,5 Am I misunderstand; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-10/msg00000.html (12,884 bytes)
2. Re: [BackupPC-users] Blackout period not working? (score: 1): Author: Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey AT BUC DOT com>; Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:23:14 -0400; Two possibilities come to mind: 1) You didn't specify whether you were looking at the main server config or the host config. Blackout periods can be set on a per-host basis, so a host config can over; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-10/msg00001.html (12,732 bytes)
3. Re: [BackupPC-users] Blackout period not working? (score: 1): Author: Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu AT orgfarm.uu DOT se>; Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:37:30 +0000; Good point, thanks. Checking... Main config (BPC-server): 8-18, all weekdays Host config (cloud server): 8-18, all weekdays The badping limit and good content are set at their defaults three and sev; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-10/msg00002.html (14,243 bytes)
4. Re: [BackupPC-users] Blackout period not working? (score: 1): Author: Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey AT BUC DOT com>; Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:10:46 -0400; Go to the host page on the web interface and look at the summary info at the top. There should be a couple of lines that look something like this: - Pings to <host> have succeeded 1417 consecutive ti; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-10/msg00003.html (14,659 bytes)
5. Re: [BackupPC-users] Blackout period not working? (score: 1): Author: Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu AT orgfarm.uu DOT se>; Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:30:07 +0000; Aha! You may be on to something here. Something seems to have happened during the last days or so. Have some log-digging to do it seems... "Pings to 'FQDN' have succeeded 9 consecutive times. Becaus; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-10/msg00004.html (13,734 bytes)
6. Re: [BackupPC-users] Blackout period not working? (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:12:32 -0500; On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu AT orgfarm.uu DOT se> wrote: Note that the next full is going to be based off the time of the last one. If you want to push it back to its norma; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-10/msg00005.html (14,029 bytes)
7. Re: [BackupPC-users] Blackout period not working? (score: 1): Author: Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu AT orgfarm.uu DOT se>; Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:12:34 +0000; <colourful expletive>, I've been using BackupPC for so long, and I still am missing out on the basic stuff... Thanks for the heads-up Les. -- //Sorin Attachment: smime.p7s Description: S/MIME crypto; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-10/msg00006.html (13,296 bytes)
8. [BackupPC-users] Backuppc on CentOS with btrfs? disaster recover? (score: 1): Author: Jonathan Murray <jmurray AT whoi DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:09:11 -0400; Hello, Is there anyone out there successfully using btrfs on CentOS/Redhat with BackupPC? We're deploying some new machines that will be duplicated via snapshots to an off site location and we're con; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-10/msg00007.html (10,784 bytes)
9. [BackupPC-users] debian sid problems (score: 1): Author: Mauro Condarelli <mc5686 AT mclink DOT it>; Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 00:10:34 +0200; Hi, I am setting up a brand new BackupPC server (on a VirtialBox VM). I sat up a minimal sid server (I wanted 3.3.1) with stretch netinstall ans sid upgtade. I installed *only* the default (no deskto; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00000.html (12,177 bytes)
10. Re: [BackupPC-users] debian sid problems (score: 1): Author: Michael Stowe <mstowe AT chicago.us.mensa DOT org>; Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 17:27:33 -0500; <clipped> cgid provides the exact same functionality as cgi. So you can either just use cgid, or switch your MPM. Switch your mpm: sudo a2dismod mpm_event sudo a2enmod mpm_prefork sudo service apache; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00001.html (11,550 bytes)
11. [BackupPC-users] destination directory and encrytion (score: 1): Author: Jan Novak <repcom AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:35:19 +0200; Hi there, two questions: Is it possible to switch the destination directory of the backup for each host and how can be a backup encoded (because of unsecure cloud server or similar)? bfo -- Monitor Y; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00002.html (12,826 bytes)
12. Re: [BackupPC-users] destination directory and encrytion (score: 1): Author: Mauro Condarelli <mc5686 AT mclink DOT it>; Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:48:31 +0200; AFAIK answer is "no and no". Reasonably sure about first one. Second one could be possible via crypted filesystem, if that is ok with You. Il 02/09/2015 15:35, Jan Novak ha scritto: -- Monitor Your D; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00003.html (14,547 bytes)
13. Re: [BackupPC-users] destination directory and encrytion (score: 1): Author: Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey AT BUC DOT com>; Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 10:12:37 -0400; No, all of the backups go in a single directory structure due to the use of hardlinks to reduce disk usage. Each host will have it's own directory under the main data directory. I believe the only wa; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00004.html (13,498 bytes)
14. Re: [BackupPC-users] destination directory and encrytion (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Boris Neubert" <omega AT online DOT de>; Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 21:30:56 +0200; Am 2. September 2015 16:15:34 schrieb Bowie I am also looking for a reasonable solution for encrypting remote backups. Encryption of the underlying filesystem on the remote end would not do the job b; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00005.html (14,001 bytes)
15. Re: [BackupPC-users] destination directory and encrytion (score: 1): Author: Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey AT BUC DOT com>; Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:47:00 -0400; In order to encrypt the files, you would have to modify backuppc so that it can read the encrypted files for comparison purposes. This should be possible as it has already been done for compression,; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00006.html (14,432 bytes)
16. Re: [BackupPC-users] destination directory and encrytion (score: 1): Author: Brad Alexander <storm16 AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:50:04 -0400; I am also looking for a reasonable solution for encrypting remote backups. Encryption of the underlying filesystem on the remote end would not do the job because data are readily accessible as long a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00007.html (16,245 bytes)
17. Re: [BackupPC-users] destination directory and encrytion (score: 1): Author: Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey AT BUC DOT com>; Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:01:21 -0400; You could use that to encrypt an archive copy of a host, but it wouldn't work for encrypting the whole backup directory, which is what I believe he is looking for. Bowie On 9/2/2015 3:50 PM, Brad Ale; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00008.html (19,508 bytes)
18. Re: [BackupPC-users] destination directory and encrytion (score: 1): Author: Frantiek Star� <frantisek AT stary DOT net>; Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 22:06:54 +0200; What about this? http://rsyncrypto.lingnu.com/index.php/Home_Page I've been thinking about trying it, but never did.. AFAIK it should look as an normal rsync server for BackupPC, so it could work. Fr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00009.html (21,875 bytes)
19. Re: [BackupPC-users] destination directory and encrytion (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Boris Neubert" <omega AT online DOT de>; Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 22:35:34 +0200; you are right - my proposal would not encrypt the metadata like filename and path, at least not without additional efforts. Thank you all for the replies, will look into th SF project. Boris -- von m; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00010.html (21,877 bytes)
20. [BackupPC-users] BackupPC_fixLinks.pl - Where to download? (score: 1): Author: Matthias Meyer <matthias.meyer AT gmx DOT li>; Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 22:57:12 +0200; Hi all, I have a lot of files in my pc-tree which are not correct linked into my pool. I'll like to verify and linked them correctly into my pool (not cpool). I've found some mailings regarding Backu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00011.html (11,899 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]