Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Windows\s+2012\s+server\s+issues\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] Windows 2012 server issues (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Brandt <gbr AT majentis DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 17:21:04 -0500
Hi, I have a WIndows 2003 Server I back up daily. Using the same parameters on WIndows 2012 fails. I currently use smb to do the back from C$. Has there been any chnages in smb with 2012? Tomorrow, I
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00204.html (11,121 bytes)

2. Re: [BackupPC-users] Windows 2012 server issues (score: 1)
Author: Phil Kennedy <phillip.kennedy AT yankeeairmuseum DOT org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 18:58:19 -0400
What errors are you seeing? If it's the tar:712 error, that has been discussed in the list archives; the patch for the recent badlock vulnerabilities changed samba's verbose output in such a manner t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00205.html (13,847 bytes)

3. Re: [BackupPC-users] Windows 2012 server issues (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Brandt <gbr AT majentis DOT com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:05:36 -0500
On 2016-05-24 05:58 PM, Phil Kennedy wrote: What errors are you seeing? If it's the tar:712 error, that has been discussed in the list archives; the patch for the recent badlock vulnerabilities chang
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00206.html (14,179 bytes)

4. Re: [BackupPC-users] Windows 2012 server issues (score: 1)
Author: Michael Stowe <mstowe AT chicago.us.mensa DOT org>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:31:22 -0500
First, I should answer the question, "have there been any changes in smb with 2012?" Yes, there have, Windows 2012 uses SMB 3.0, whereas Windows 2003 uses SMB version 1.0. If your smbclient is suffic
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00207.html (15,347 bytes)

5. Re: [BackupPC-users] Windows 2012 server issues (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Brandt <gbr AT majentis DOT com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 11:43:08 -0500
Hi, Definitely not an output parsing issue. I had that on some other systems and fixed it. I also tried the command line before I sent the email to the list. I should put more info into the original
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00208.html (16,951 bytes)

6. Re: [BackupPC-users] Windows 2012 server issues (score: 1)
Author: Michael Stowe <mstowe AT chicago.us.mensa DOT org>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 13:04:28 -0500
[removed for clarity] I note several obvious differences between the command line that works and the command line that does not; the working account is using a domain account, and the non-working one
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00209.html (14,286 bytes)

7. [BackupPC-users] Windows 2012 server issues (score: 1)
Author: karlis <backuppc-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 04:02:20 -0700
Is Your server AD controller? If so, local administrator (as in non working case) is disabled and You can connect only as domain administrator (as in working case). -- Karlis Running: /usr/bin/smbcli
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00222.html (12,823 bytes)

8. Re: [BackupPC-users] Windows 2012 server issues (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Brandt <gbr AT majentis DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:38:02 -0500
Hi, It's not an AD controller, it's part of a 2003 AD domain though. Gerald -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals whi
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00223.html (14,247 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu