Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Uneffective\s+rsync\s+transfers\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] Uneffective rsync transfers? (score: 1)
Author: Frantiek Starư <frantisek AT stary DOT net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:40:33 +0200
Hello. I've started experimenting with rsync xfer method and I've found that the rsync transfers always the changes against the last backup. There is a directory "testdir" with 3 files. First full ba
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2014-06/msg00079.html (21,891 bytes)

2. Re: [BackupPC-users] Uneffective rsync transfers? (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:47:19 -0500
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Frantiek Starư <frantisek AT stary DOT net> wrote: You don't need to experiment to find that - see $Conf{IncrLevels} in the documentation. That's optional, See $Conf{
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2014-06/msg00080.html (16,761 bytes)

3. Re: [BackupPC-users] Uneffective rsync transfers? (score: 1)
Author: Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 02:34:54 +0200
Hi, Les Mikesell wrote on 2014-06-26 10:47:19 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Uneffective rsync transfers?]: and it's not "the last backup", it's "the reference backup". Of course, if you're only doing f
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2014-06/msg00081.html (18,149 bytes)

4. Re: [BackupPC-users] Uneffective rsync transfers? (score: 1)
Author: Frantiek Starư <frantisek AT stary DOT net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 07:59:43 +0200
Hello. I use only full backups to show the issue as clear as possible. The log file contains: 2014-06-22 11:58:22 full backup started for directory /testdir/ (baseline backup #0) 2014-06-22 11:58:24
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2014-06/msg00082.html (24,231 bytes)

5. Re: [BackupPC-users] Uneffective rsync transfers? (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:29:55 -0500
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Frantiek Starư <frantisek AT stary DOT net> wrote: Every file should show at least 2 links. One for the name in the pc tree where you are looking, and one under cpoo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2014-06/msg00085.html (14,095 bytes)

6. Re: [BackupPC-users] Uneffective rsync transfers? (score: 1)
Author: Frantiek Starư <frantisek AT stary DOT net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 10:31:39 +0200
The count of hard links is high because all the testfiles have the same content and I have more backups and more testhosts. Its a proof the pooling works. But the merging of the backups made using rs
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2014-06/msg00086.html (16,140 bytes)

7. Re: [BackupPC-users] Uneffective rsync transfers? (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:15:30 -0500
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Frantiek Starư <frantisek AT stary DOT net> wrote: That is the way an incremental should look at the filesystem level, but the web view should fill it with the conten
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2014-06/msg00089.html (14,715 bytes)

8. Re: [BackupPC-users] Uneffective rsync transfers? (score: 1)
Author: Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:55:15 +0200
Hi, Les Mikesell wrote on 2014-06-28 20:15:30 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Uneffective rsync transfers?]: technically, it's not "merging", it's "building a view". Backups are not first built sparsely
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2014-06/msg00091.html (15,779 bytes)

9. Re: [BackupPC-users] Uneffective rsync transfers? (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:53:14 -0500
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de> wrote: I think what should be happening is that the remote side sends the equivalent of a full directory tree listing, then
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2014-06/msg00099.html (14,492 bytes)

10. Re: [BackupPC-users] Uneffective rsync transfers? (score: 1)
Author: Frantiek Starư <frantisek AT stary DOT net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 21:18:09 +0200
I've installed Ubuntu 14.04 server with backuppc version 3.3.0-1ubuntu1 into clean virtual machine. Rsync xfer method worked good there (without described issues). So I've used backuppc_3.3.0-1ubuntu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2014-06/msg00100.html (15,182 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu