Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Setup\s+two\s+NIC\'s\s+to\s+improve\s+performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Setup\s+two\s+NIC\'s\s+to\s+improve\s+performance\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] Setup two NIC's to improve performance (score: 1): Author: Jaco <jaco AT oaks.co DOT za>; Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:26:19 +0200; Hi Guys, Would I be able to setup two nic's on my backuppc server to improve network transfer performance to the backuppc server. I usually have a least two backups running at the same time on this s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-06/msg00049.html (12,532 bytes)
2. Re: [BackupPC-users] Setup two NIC's to improve performance (score: 1): Author: Bruce <bruce AT sqls DOT net>; Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:07:32 -0500; Does your switch support trunking/pairing/bonding of ports? http://www.linuxhorizon.ro/bonding.html http://www.cyberciti.biz/howto/question/static/linux-ethernet-bonding-driver-howto.php I'm sure you; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-06/msg00050.html (14,666 bytes)
3. Re: [BackupPC-users] Setup two NIC's to improve performance (score: 1): Author: "Tyler J. Wagner" <tyler AT tolaris DOT com>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:27:35 +0100; What you want to do is create a bonded interface. Here's the Red Hat way: http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-bond-or-team-multiple-network-interfacesnic-into-single-interface.html And the Ubuntu way; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-06/msg00051.html (14,866 bytes)
4. Re: [BackupPC-users] Setup two NIC's to improve performance (score: 1): Author: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <chrome AT real-time DOT com>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:27:52 -0500; You'll likely get a lot more performance for your money by adding RAM; and after that, faster disks. If you already have a GB NIC, you're almost certainly outstripping disk performance, especially wi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-06/msg00052.html (13,331 bytes)
5. Re: [BackupPC-users] Setup two NIC's to improve performance (score: 1): Author: "Tyler J. Wagner" <tyler AT tolaris DOT com>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:31:52 +0100; I have a no-name server with a 3-ware SATA RAID controller and two gigabit ethernet interfaces. Between two servers on the same gigabit LAN, using default 1500-byte MTU, copying between disks, I can; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-06/msg00053.html (13,263 bytes)
6. Re: [BackupPC-users] Setup two NIC's to improve performance (score: 1): Author: Bruce <bruce AT sqls DOT net>; Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:47:48 -0500; Oh, umn sorry. I should have been more clear. I was trying to say 100 megabyte (MB) per second. Not mbit (mb). I've actually seen 109MB/s on a couple of intel nics here. -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's Geek; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-06/msg00054.html (13,592 bytes)
7. Re: [BackupPC-users] Setup two NIC's to improve performance (score: 1): Author: "Tyler J. Wagner" <tyler AT tolaris DOT com>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:09:38 +0100; Doh! I missed the big B, and I'm a network engineer. No donut for me! Tyler -- "Freedom of thought is best promoted by the gradual illumination of men's minds, which follows from the advance of scien; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-06/msg00055.html (15,016 bytes)
8. Re: [BackupPC-users] Setup two NIC's to improve performance (score: 1): Author: Ed McDonagh <ed.mcdonagh AT rmh.nhs DOT uk>; Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:10:40 +0100; What about the big and little 'm'? 'm'illi/'M'ega... makes quite a lot of difference too, even if a millibit/byte isn't a very useful unit! Ed Attention: This e-mail and any attachment is for authori; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-06/msg00056.html (16,345 bytes)
9. Re: [BackupPC-users] Setup two NIC's to improve performance (score: 1): Author: Bruce <bruce AT sqls DOT net>; Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:26:14 -0500; Ed wins. -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sf; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-06/msg00057.html (17,904 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]