Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Sanity\s+check\s+re\:\s+pooling\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Sanity\s+check\s+re\:\s+pooling\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] Sanity check re: pooling. (score: 1): Author: "Ken D'Ambrosio" <ken AT jots DOT org>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:47:08 -0500 (EST); Hi! I've got two servers, each around a TB, that I'm backing up with BackupPC. (No, not for "real" backups, but to be able to not have to recall tapes when someone deletes a file. Darn users.) I'm pl; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-12/msg00016.html (12,050 bytes)
2. Re: [BackupPC-users] Sanity check re: pooling. (score: 1): Author: Ed McDonagh <ed.mcdonagh AT rmh.nhs DOT uk>; Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:48:00 +0000; I think you are right, in the medium term. In the short term, if the host is different then everything will be new and will be transferred over to the backup machine. Once there, it will be checked a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-12/msg00017.html (13,621 bytes)
3. Re: [BackupPC-users] Sanity check re: pooling. (score: 1): Author: gregwm <backuppc-users AT whitleymott DOT net>; Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 05:32:32 -0600; hmm, i rather expect the pool check doesn't follow all the transfers, rather is interleaved with the transfers, if i'm right the temporary ballooning you describe should not occur other than a file a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-12/msg00042.html (16,442 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]