Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Multiple\s+schedules\s+per\s+host\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] Multiple schedules per host (score: 1)
Author: Robert Kosinski <robert.kosinski AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:21:56 -0500
Is the best method to enforce multiple backup schedules for a single host to list an alias in the hosts file and build around that? Are there any issues using short name for one instance and fully qu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-11/msg00116.html (11,738 bytes)

2. Re: [BackupPC-users] Multiple schedules per host (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:28:19 -0600
You can use a different host name in the backuppc configuration to get separate options and use the ClientAlias to point it back to the actual target. As far as backuppc is concerned they are separat
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-11/msg00119.html (12,195 bytes)

3. Re: [BackupPC-users] Multiple schedules per host (score: 1)
Author: Robert Kosinski <robert.kosinski AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:38:23 -0500
Sure makes the interface look cleaner without a bunch of FQDNs. Too bad it eradicates DHCP support, but not a specific concern in my case since all DHCP hosts are registered in DNS. Thanks for the su
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-11/msg00151.html (13,853 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu