Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+I\'d\s+like\s+to\s+make\s+a\s+suggestion\s+to\s+the\s+BPC\s+devsm\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BackupPC-users] I'd like to make a suggestion to the BPC devsm (score: 1)
Author: Bzzzz <lazyvirus AT gmx DOT com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 17:38:12 +0200
Among many other, Apple products are to stay out of the company. I do not use that, all of our servers are home build, using such things as Debian Linux, ZFS, XFS, GlusterFS, etc; this holds the staf
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2017-07/msg00100.html (12,313 bytes)

2. Re: [BackupPC-users] I'd like to make a suggestion to the BPC devsm (score: 1)
Author: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists AT websitemanagers.com DOT au>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 02:40:57 +1000
The quick fix here is to use a Mac with an external or network drive for time machine. If you aren't familiar with it, it does exactly Among many other, Apple products are to stay out of the company
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2017-07/msg00101.html (13,248 bytes)

3. Re: [BackupPC-users] I'd like to make a suggestion to the BPC devsm (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:18:42 -0500
On the image copy front, I think for linux at least there could be an easy integration between BPC and RearR https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/System_Admin
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2017-07/msg00102.html (13,749 bytes)

4. Re: [BackupPC-users] I'd like to make a suggestion to the BPC devsm (score: 1)
Author: Bzzzz <lazyvirus AT gmx DOT com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 19:32:17 +0200
Hmm, I'm not that sure; for the time being, snapshots will be kept and doubled w/ other BPC servers for daily "snapshots" of only work directories. Time will say if ZFS snapshots are mandatory or com
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2017-07/msg00103.html (12,557 bytes)

5. Re: [BackupPC-users] I'd like to make a suggestion to the BPC devsm (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 13:12:25 -0500
There is a missing piece in terms of recreating the partitions/filesystems/raids to match the system you want to recreate, unless you have already automated that with tuned kickstart files or all of
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2017-07/msg00104.html (13,031 bytes)

6. Re: [BackupPC-users] I'd like to make a suggestion to the BPC devsm (score: 1)
Author: Bzzzz <lazyvirus AT gmx DOT com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 20:48:28 +0200
OMFG, ZE missing link ? ;-p) As servers structures are always identical, local daemons excepted, we use another way to do so: boot on a FAI server, install a minimal system, including rsync, restore
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2017-07/msg00105.html (12,886 bytes)

7. Re: [BackupPC-users] I'd like to make a suggestion to the BPC devsm (score: 1)
Author: Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 14:46:13 -0700
OMFG, ZE missing link ? ;-p) As servers structures are always identical, local daemons excepted, we use another way to do so:  boot on a FAI server,  install a minimal system, including rsync,  rest
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2017-07/msg00127.html (15,414 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu