Hi Bacukppcers, My suggestion is to avoid using such things as FS snapshots during the day to avoid work losses. An addition to BPC could do the trick, preferably saving the result in another directo
Author: Daniel Berteaud <daniel AT firewall-services DOT com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:26:18 +0200
Le 20/07/2017 à 02:54, Bzzzz a écrit : Hi Bacukppcers, My suggestion is to avoid using such things as FS snapshots during the day to avoid work losses. An addition to BPC could do the trick, preferab
Please develop, don't drop me dry, why is that? Why adding a kinda-Xtiple-fugitive-daily-snapshots of only touched files is out of the BPC's scope ? On the other hand, I see this as the missing compl
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:17:29 -0500
You can set the schedule to run as often as you like, but the underlying tools are going to have to traverse the whole directory tree to find the touched files, which you probably don't want to happe
Author: Ray Frush <frush AT rams.colostate DOT edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:18:44 -0600
Please develop, don't drop me dry, why is that? Why adding a kinda-Xtiple-fugitive-daily- snapshots of only touched files is out of the BPC's scope ? On the other hand, I see this as the missing com
This stage just slow down machines for a bout a minute, which is acceptable. If I didn't want serious security, I'd use w$, which is about the same level JY -- Check out the vibrant tech community on
"interesting settings" is the corner stone of this. OK, fair explanation this time; too bad. I'll dive into the snapshot code to see if a timestamp check can be easily implemented - thanks. JY -- Che
Author: Daniel Berteaud <daniel AT firewall-services DOT com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 17:27:30 +0200
I think this is out of BackupPC's scope Please develop, don't drop me dry, why is that? Why adding a kinda-Xtiple-fugitive-daily-snapshots of only touched files is out of the BPC's scope ? On the ot
Fair enough, I'm gonna watch this closely - thanks. JY -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _________________
Author: "G.W. Haywood" <backup AT jubileegroup.co DOT uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:27:43 +0100 (BST)
Hi there, ... clumsy users would be able to recover their work very rapidly with at most one hour loss ... How about that ? You want to apply a technical answer to a non-technical question. Bad idea.
Author: Kenneth Porter <shiva AT sewingwitch DOT com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 06:29:46 -0700
--On Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:54 AM +0200 Bzzzz <lazyvirus AT gmx DOT com> wrote: An addition to BPC could do the trick, preferably saving the result in another directory than the main one, by check
Yep, this is much closer to what I imagined. Not necessarily, as other files than work aren't important in this matter; the idea (I forgot to allude to formerly:/) is to confine the modified version
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:27:41 -0500
The quick fix here is to use a Mac with an external or network drive for time machine. If you aren't familiar with it, it does exactly what you suggested with easy access for the user and filesystem
Author: Ray Frush <frush AT rams.colostate DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:38:11 -0600
The quick fix here is to use a Mac with an external or network drive for time machine. If you aren't familiar with it, it does exactly what you suggested with easy access for the user and filesyste