Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Full\s+vs\.\s+Inc\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Full\s+vs\.\s+Inc\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Inc (score: 1): Author: Christian Völker <chrischan AT knebb DOT de>; Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:24:16 +0200; Yohoo! I'm trying to understand the way BackupPC works. I'm using only rsync as transfer method. So one of my questions regards the difference between Full vs. Inc Backups. Does the full backup copy; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2008-08/msg00278.html (12,062 bytes)
2. Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Inc (score: 1): Author: Tino Schwarze <backuppc.lists AT tisc DOT de>; Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:33:40 +0200; Hi Christian, The following applies to rsync only! The difference between a full and an incremental rsync backup is that rsync will check the whole file checksum during full backup (to guard against; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2008-08/msg00279.html (12,814 bytes)
3. Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Inc (score: 1): Author: Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de>; Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:16:58 +0200; Hi, Tino Schwarze wrote on 2008-08-28 23:33:40 +0200 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Full vs. Inc]: ... and undetected alteration of the file on the client (same stats including size and timestamp - probably r; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2008-08/msg00282.html (14,785 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]