Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Backup\s+Data\s+Transfer\s+Speed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Backup\s+Data\s+Transfer\s+Speed\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] Backup Data Transfer Speed (score: 1): Author: Gary Roach <gary719_list1 AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:43:28 -0700; Hi, I am modifying my whole backup system for greater volume and speed. The new system is as follows: Software - Backuppc using rsync (without SSH) Server - D865PERL Motherboard Pentium 4 - 2.4 GHz P; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2013-04/msg00014.html (15,278 bytes)
2. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup Data Transfer Speed (score: 1): Author: Jeff Folsom <jeff.folsom AT utah DOT edu>; Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 15:01:58 -0600; Hi, I am modifying my whole backup system for greater volume and speed. The new system is as follows: Software - Backuppc using rsync (without SSH) Server - D865PERL Motherboard; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2013-04/msg00015.html (17,427 bytes)
3. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup Data Transfer Speed (score: 1): Author: <backuppc AT kosowsky DOT org>; Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:26:11 -0400; Gary Roach wrote at about 13:43:28 -0700 on Sunday, April 7, 2013: I am not aware of *any* general complaints about any general hardware. Complaints if any typically reflect a lack of understanding a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2013-04/msg00016.html (16,699 bytes)
4. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup Data Transfer Speed (score: 1): Author: "Phil K." <phillip.kennedy AT yankeeairmuseum DOT org>; Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 18:33:39 -0400; Another consideration is file system. Once you get beyond basic hardware, there are a number of tweaks to look at on the software side. Your setup isn't terrible, but there's a lot of room for improv; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2013-04/msg00017.html (18,124 bytes)
5. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup Data Transfer Speed (score: 1): Author: John Habermann <jhabermann AT cook.qld.gov DOT au>; Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:36:46 +1000; I have one client that shows a speed of 51.24 MB/s for its last full backup but this is definitely not a indication of the wire speed of the link between it and the server as that is a PTP wireless l; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2013-04/msg00018.html (18,907 bytes)
6. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup Data Transfer Speed (score: 1): Author: Gary Roach <gary719_list1 AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:02:22 -0700; Thank you all for you input. Some clarification: The router/switch is being replaced with a Verizon M1424 Gegabit device. I plan on increasing the memory on the server. This is a home system and the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2013-04/msg00019.html (19,846 bytes)
7. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup Data Transfer Speed (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:03:04 -0500; On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Gary Roach <gary719_list1 AT verizon DOT net> wrote: Your bottleneck is really going to be the seek time on those older disk drives, and the smaller the files the mor; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2013-04/msg00020.html (13,863 bytes)
8. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup Data Transfer Speed (score: 1): Author: Jeff Folsom <jeff.folsom AT utah DOT edu>; Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:20:21 -0600; Your bottleneck is really going to be the seek time on those older disk drives, and the smaller the files the more trips the heads have to make to the diretory/inode/data. Adding RAM can help some; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2013-04/msg00021.html (16,634 bytes)
9. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup Data Transfer Speed (score: 1): Author: <backuppc AT kosowsky DOT org>; Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:59:18 -0400; Gary Roach wrote at about 09:02:22 -0700 on Monday, April 8, 2013: I think you could expect 5-10 MB/S on a GigE network (assuming truly GigE) with the rate limiting step being your CPU and the combin; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2013-04/msg00023.html (21,131 bytes)
10. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup Data Transfer Speed (score: 1): Author: Gary Roach <gary719_list1 AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:08:27 -0700; Thank you all for your comments. I think I'll scrap the GigE network, use the checksum caching suggestion an load up on RAM. The Green drive is already purchased. This is pretty light load system so; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2013-04/msg00026.html (15,968 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]