Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+storage\s+pool\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+storage\s+pool\s+question\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] storage pool question (score: 1): Author: Mehdi Salehi <ezzobad AT GOOGLEMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:57:05 +1000; Hi all, A tape-based storage pool is defined just as next pool of backuppool and archivepool. Can I assign this pool as the destination of some clients, too? It means that pool would be capable of re; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-04/msg00235.html (10,824 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] storage pool question (score: 1): Author: ADSM-L <tsm AT NETWORKC.CO DOT UK>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:05:39 +0100; It certainly is possible, and often implemented in the case of clients backing up large objects or LANfree clients, providing you have your management class policies appropriately defined. /David McC; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-04/msg00236.html (11,411 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] storage pool question (score: 1): Author: Mehdi Salehi <ezzobad AT GOOGLEMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 22:22:33 +1000; Thanks David, Does it matter from DRM point-of-view if there are many storage pools?; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-04/msg00237.html (10,692 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] storage pool question (score: 1): Author: km <km AT GROGG DOT ORG>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:52:14 +0200; As long as you make sure all of your primary stgpools go to the COPY/DRM-pool there is nothing else special about it.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-04/msg00240.html (10,916 bytes)
5. [ADSM-L] storage pool question (score: 1): Author: Michael Read <Michael.Read AT SANOFI-AVENTIS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:30:33 -0500; I am wanting to eliminate some of our current storage pools. I think I know what I need to verify before deleting things, but can someone double check my thoughts below? -- "query stgpool" shows that; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-04/msg00331.html (11,197 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] storage pool question (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:56:59 -0400; I am wanting to eliminate some of our current storage pools. ... Michael - I would, some weeks ahead of time, change the stgpool's Access to Readonly, with no Nextstgpool, and see if any complaints; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-04/msg00332.html (10,926 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] storage pool question (score: 1): Author: Shawn Drew <shawn.drew AT AMERICAS.BNPPARIBAS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:10:55 -0400; I'd also check your copygroups and scripts select domain_name, set_name, destination from BU_COPYGROUPS select domain_name, set_name, destination from AR_COPYGROUPS -Shawn Internet rbs AT BU DOT EDU; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-04/msg00376.html (12,426 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]