Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+rebinding\s+of\s+objects\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+rebinding\s+of\s+objects\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] rebinding of objects (score: 1): Author: Michael Prix <mp AT RS6000.DARKTECH DOT ORG>; Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:05:37 +0100; Hello, I'm well aware of the rebinding of objects in case of an incremental backup. Well documented and proven. But what I'm not so sure about is the case of rebinding when using API-calls, especiall; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2017-02/msg00096.html (10,772 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] rebinding of objects (score: 1): Author: Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:22:48 -0500; HI Michael, Yes, it will rebind them if you are using the same NODENAME. If you want multiple COPY type backups with different policies, you will need to use a different NODENAME. Del -- "ADSM: Dist; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2017-02/msg00100.html (11,658 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]