Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+re\-label\s+3592\-3C\s+as\s+3592\-2C\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+re\-label\s+3592\-3C\s+as\s+3592\-2C\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] re-label 3592-3C as 3592-2C ? (score: 1): Author: "Arbogast, Warren K" <warbogas AT INDIANA DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:13:25 +0000; Both of our TSM/EE servers are at version 6.3.2 running on RHEL5. Each server has a 3584 ATL attached to it with both 3592-E06 and 3592-E05 tape drives installed. The 3592-E05 drives were not removed; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-10/msg00064.html (11,631 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] re-label 3592-3C as 3592-2C ? (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary" <GLEE AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:59:21 +0000; I see no reason why not. However, make sure the printed labels and vol labels agree. I suspect they will have to have separate category codes and be separate logical libraries. That's how I would do; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-10/msg00065.html (13,497 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] re-label 3592-3C as 3592-2C ? (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:49:39 -0400; Sure. We did this a lot when moving between formats like you (we are now all E06). Check out the LABEL LIBVOLUME command. I don't know the 3584 (we have a 3494) but you might be able to set the libra; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-10/msg00066.html (12,743 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]