Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+deleing\s+data\s+from\s+a\s+containerpool\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: "Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:20:49 +0000
Hi all! After doing some extensive testing with a directory container storagepool I noticed a significant change compared to the old traditional storage pools. In a traditional storage pool TSM store
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00026.html (12,395 bytes)

2. Re: [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:33:09 +0200
Yes, I too have noticed this and it is something to keep in mind. At the same time, I think almost everybody using this pool will be using SSD's for the database the impact will be overseeable. But t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00027.html (13,953 bytes)

3. Re: [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: "Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 07:39:27 +0000
Hi Stefan! Our database is on SSD in an IBM V3700, but the time needed for a del filespace can be significant though. But I totally agree, everyone who is using file device classes or expensive backe
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00028.html (16,259 bytes)

4. Re: [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: "Rhodes, Richard L." <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:06:45 +0000
We currently use DataDomains. With a DD it dedups what it can, then compresses the rest. Does TSM also try and compress what is leftover after dedup? Hi Stefan! Our database is on SSD in an IBM V370
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00042.html (17,761 bytes)

5. Re: [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: David Ehresman <david.ehresman AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:12:09 +0000
At the most recent levels of TSM, it both dedups and compresses but make sure you are at a level that does both. There was a level that only did dedup but not compression. David We currently use Data
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00043.html (19,315 bytes)

6. Re: [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: "Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:53:08 +0000
Indeed, TSM 7.1.0 to 7.1.5 only supported deduplication, additional compression was introduced in 7.1.6. Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage Engineering At the most recent levels of TS
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00044.html (21,703 bytes)

7. Re: [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: David Ehresman <david.ehresman AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:55:36 +0000
Compression was introduced in 7.5.1.something, I think 7.1.5.2. David Indeed, TSM 7.1.0 to 7.1.5 only supported deduplication, additional compression was introduced in 7.1.6. Kind regards, Eric van L
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00045.html (22,890 bytes)

8. Re: [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:01:49 -0400
Minor correction. Inline compression for container pools was added in March in 7.1.5. IBM Spectrum Protect 7.1.5 - Inline compression: - Performed in-line after deduplication to provide additional st
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00046.html (24,957 bytes)

9. Re: [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: David Ehresman <david.ehresman AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:11:08 +0000
I can assure you that compression was NOT part of the earlier releases on 7.1.5 on AIX. I had to painfully tear down a system we were trying to convert to because compression was not included in the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00047.html (26,342 bytes)

10. Re: [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:44:38 -0400
To be clear... Server-side inline compression shipped in 7.1.5 (March) however the "client-side" LZ4 compression piece of this shipped in 7.1.6 (June). Del -- "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00048.html (32,528 bytes)

11. Re: [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: Matthew McGeary <Matthew.McGeary AT POTASHCORP DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:50:51 -0600
I bled hard and installed 7.1.5 while the paint was wet. Compression was available on AIX concurrently with all other releases. WAN acceleration, on the other hand, is not. Booo! ____________________
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00050.html (30,298 bytes)

12. Re: [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:43:28 +0200
This inline deduplication and compression thing really is amazing; excerpt from q stgpool f=d Deduplication Savings: 153,840 G (90.83%) Compression Savings: 8,711 G (56.07%) Total Space Saved: 162,55
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00054.html (27,540 bytes)

13. Re: [ADSM-L] deleing data from a containerpool (score: 1)
Author: David Ehresman <david.ehresman AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:55:48 +0000
We are getting a 78% savings on a mixed workload (BA, Oracle, VM, Exchange, SQL) with about 350 nodes moving around 10TB of data a night. David This inline deduplication and compression thing really
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00055.html (28,847 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu