Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Win2008\s+System\s+State\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Ben Bullock <BBullock AT BCIDAHO DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:10:22 -0700
So, we all seem to agree that the Windows 2008 SystemState is very large (seems to be about 6GB on a fresh 2008 R2 installation), but is there anything we can do about it? It looks like it does a FUL
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00035.html (16,829 bytes)

2. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: ADSM-L <tsm AT NETWORKC.CO DOT UK>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:44:06 +0000
Just a thought, and I'm sure you'll already have been over this, but do the recovery scenarios for which you employ TSM for protection require the SystemState etc to be backed-up/recovered? In some s
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00036.html (17,549 bytes)

3. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:01:11 -0500
Tivoli Development utilizes the APIs provided by the vendors of other software, so as to best fulfill the TSM role of data assurance and coherency. Such APIs may result in side effects resembling tho
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00037.html (12,307 bytes)

4. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Wanda Prather <wanda.prather AT JASI DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:29:10 -0500
Yes, systemstate backups have always been fulls. (I believe there was some mumbling about Win2K3 changing something to make it possible to do incrementals instead of fulls, but I've never seen any di
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00038.html (20,210 bytes)

5. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:44:13 -0600
Wanda, My calculations Current Windows = 3 Gb in c$; new Windows = 15 Gb in c$. That's installed out of the box. If we collocated by filespace, the $c tape would hold about 250 clients from current W
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00039.html (13,847 bytes)

6. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Wanda Prather <wprather AT JASI DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:48:39 -0500
THANK YOU Fred - 71000 new DB entries, per client, per day, is data base doom. I'm gonna start recommending the preschedule with ntbackup to everybody.... W
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00040.html (14,690 bytes)

7. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Steven Harris <steve AT STEVENHARRIS DOT INFO>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:17:01 +1100
Wanda I've been out of the loop for a little while but... The last project I worked on was a while new infrastructure using a lot of Win2008 R1. TSM 5.5.1 and 2 clients made noises about incrementall
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00041.html (15,552 bytes)

8. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Grigori Solonovitch <G.Solonovitch AT BKME DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:47:01 +0300
Have yuo tried to use TSM Client 6.1.2 for Windows (just anonced)? There is quite serious improvement for SYSTEMSTATE. So, we all seem to agree that the Windows 2008 SystemState is very large (seems
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00043.html (17,867 bytes)

9. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Grigori Solonovitch <G.Solonovitch AT BKME DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:49:24 +0300
I agree, that restoring SYSTEMSTATE is very exotic action, but it cab be used anyway for some cases. Usually SYSTEMSTATE backups are used for disaster recovery of Windows server. In this case, you ne
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00044.html (20,587 bytes)

10. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Grigori Solonovitch <G.Solonovitch AT BKME DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:04:34 +0300
What do you mean saing "full backup"? If you check "dsmc query systemstate -inactive -detail", you will see that all backups are full. But full has relationship with VSS writes in Windows and it has
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00045.html (22,258 bytes)

11. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:53:32 -0500
up really We want to make sure your TSM databases are fully utilized. :-) Actually the first sentence above is spot on: We understand the impact of system state backup for Windows, especially post-W
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00063.html (16,160 bytes)

12. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Lipp <lipp AT STORSERVER DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:09:25 -0700
Andy's sense of humor is a welcome addition to this forum. I hope it doesn't get missed in the midst of all the great information he provides. Heee heee heee. Kelly (trying to make sure we can fit en
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00065.html (16,867 bytes)

13. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:09:44 +0100
It should be getting obvious to development that this architecture is doomed, and not gonna work for folks in the long term. Benefits we pick up with the DB performance improvements in 6.1 (yes, it
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00070.html (14,441 bytes)

14. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Wanda Prather <wanda.prather AT JASI DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:38:41 -0500
Hee hee! THANK YOU Andy! Wanda ;>) On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Raibeck <storman AT us.ibm DOT com> wrote:
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00087.html (17,007 bytes)

15. [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Christian Svensson <Christian.Svensson AT CRISTIE DOT SE>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:46:19 +0100
Hi Guys, Does anyone have a link to Microsoft where it says that Win2008 System State Backup is much bigger then Windows 2003 System State? I need to prove for a customer that System State and System
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-10/msg00372.html (10,824 bytes)

16. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Joe Crnjanski <JCrnjanski AT INFINITYNETWORK DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:32:13 -0400
It's a tough world out there. Nobody believes us any more!! Sorry, no answer for you, yet. Joe Crnjanski Infinity Network Solutions Inc. Phone: 416-235-0931 x226 Fax: 416-235-0265 Web: www.infinityne
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-10/msg00379.html (11,389 bytes)

17. Re: [ADSM-L] Win2008 System State (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:37:51 -0400
I am not aware of any links off-hand to any official Microsoft statements. Why would your customer doubt this? Alternatives that come to mind: - Take a look at the install footprint of a base Windows
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-10/msg00380.html (13,236 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu