Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Why\s+is\s+is\s+dedup\s+cache\s+file\s+not\s+excluded\s+by\s+default\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Why\s+is\s+is\s+dedup\s+cache\s+file\s+not\s+excluded\s+by\s+default\s+\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ? (score: 1): Author: Erwann SIMON <erwann.simon AT FREE DOT FR>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 07:13:52 +0100; Hi all, I'm wondering why the dedup cache file (TSMDEDUPDB_servernamenodename.DB, located in the dedupcachepath directory) is not excluded by default ? I generally exclude it because it causes somes; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2018-02/msg00081.html (8,705 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ? (score: 1): Author: Rick Adamson <RickAdamson AT SEGROCERS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:31:17 +0000; Erwann, I have client option sets defined on the server that I use to globally exclude it from all file level backups. -Rick Adamson * This email originated outside of the organization. Use caution w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2018-02/msg00082.html (10,134 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ? (score: 1): Author: Erwann SIMON <erwann.simon AT FREE DOT FR>; Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 17:26:28 +0100; Hi Rick, Yes, this is what I always do. But I was wondering why it's not excluded by the code itself. -- Best regards / Cordialement / Erwann SIMON -- Mail original -- De: "Rick Adamson" <RickAdamson; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2018-02/msg00084.html (10,665 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 07:40:18 +0100; For as far as I know nothing is excluded by the code itself and I think this is a policy thing. Since you can install the software in different locations and you can use different names for different; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2018-02/msg00085.html (12,164 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ? (score: 1): Author: Martin Janosik <martin.janosik AT CZ.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 10:59:47 +0100; Hello, your presumtion doesn't seems accurate to me (Windows, Linux, AIX clients, mostly v7.1): ** FILE INCLUDE/EXCLUDE ** Mode Function Pattern (match from top down) Source File -- -- -- -- No exclu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2018-02/msg00086.html (13,836 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 14:26:08 +0100; Ha, I didn't know that! I guess there is one directory excluded by default. Thanks for pointing that out. On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Martin Janosik <martin.janosik AT cz.ibm DOT wrote:; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2018-02/msg00087.html (15,036 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] Why is is dedup cache file not excluded by default ? (score: 1): Author: Erwann SIMON <erwann.simon AT FREE DOT FR>; Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:23:04 +0100; Hi all, I think we all agree that backing up this dedup cache fiche is useless and that it can considered as as a best pratice to exclude it since trying to back it up generate retries. Stephan is ri; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2018-02/msg00088.html (15,793 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]