Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Unexpected\s+behavior\s+\-\s+Win2k3\,\s+TSM\s+5\.4\,\s+NTFS\s+permissions\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Unexpected behavior - Win2k3, TSM 5.4, NTFS permissions (score: 1)
Author: Jason Clarke <JCL AT GWSC.VIC.EDU DOT AU>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:39:08 +1100
Hi list, Second post :-) Win2k3 SP2 x64 Server. Win2k3 SP2 32bit Client. 5.4.0 Server and Client. We're a secondary school in the holidays. Last night, the client backed up 129GB, which is about 125G
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-01/msg00215.html (12,781 bytes)

2. Re: [ADSM-L] Unexpected behavior - Win2k3, TSM 5.4, NTFS permissions (score: 1)
Author: Mark Stapleton <Mark.Stapleton AT CDW DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:50:30 -0600
On any given day, during the holidays, theres about 2-3GB of changed files. However, I did change a permission on a directory/folder tree that contains 125GB of files. I'm guessing TSM has backed up
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-01/msg00216.html (13,949 bytes)

3. Re: [ADSM-L] Unexpected behavior - Win2k3, TSM 5.4, NTFS permissions (score: 1)
Author: Nick Laflamme <dplaflamme AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:08:00 -0600
TSM treats files as whole entities. When you change permissions on a file, TSM will back it up again. I'm surprised Mark didn't at least allude to the SKIPNTPERMISSIONS option for Windows client. It
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-01/msg00217.html (13,425 bytes)

4. Re: [ADSM-L] Unexpected behavior - Win2k3, TSM 5.4, NTFS permissions (score: 1)
Author: Mark Stapleton <Mark.Stapleton AT CDW DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:14:46 -0600
Hehe. For a reason, to be sure. I have had several customers use that option, and come to sorely regret it later. Why would anyone want to restore an incomplete/out of date/erroneous version of a fil
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-01/msg00218.html (13,064 bytes)

5. Re: [ADSM-L] Unexpected behavior - Win2k3, TSM 5.4, NTFS permissions (score: 1)
Author: Jason Clarke <JCL AT GWSC.VIC.EDU DOT AU>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:15:57 +1100
Hi Mark, Thanks for your comments. I've decided to not go with subfile backups because (from training late last year) I understood that a 1MB file could be backed up over many volumes, thus being ins
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-01/msg00219.html (15,005 bytes)

6. Re: [ADSM-L] Unexpected behavior - Win2k3, TSM 5.4, NTFS permissions (score: 1)
Author: "Kinder, Kevin P" <Kevin.P.Kinder AT WV DOT GOV>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:52:17 -0500
I haven't used the following two features in combination yet, so a question: If I were backing up using subfile and collocation, would this alleviate the problem of the subfile backups being spread o
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-01/msg00228.html (15,707 bytes)

7. Re: [ADSM-L] Unexpected behavior - Win2k3, TSM 5.4, NTFS permissions (score: 1)
Author: Mark Stapleton <Mark.Stapleton AT CDW DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:06:58 -0600
If I were backing up using subfile and collocation, would this alleviate the problem of the subfile backups being spread over many volumes? Marginally. You'd still have to wander an individual tape (
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-01/msg00229.html (13,732 bytes)

8. Re: [ADSM-L] Unexpected behavior - Win2k3, TSM 5.4, NTFS permissions (score: 1)
Author: "Schaub, Steve" <steve_schaub AT BCBST DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:14:15 -0500
We've used subfiles successfully for large files, but only because we were able to put large amount of fileclass disk behind our primary diskpools. If you do that, collocation and how many subfiles p
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-01/msg00230.html (14,728 bytes)

9. Re: [ADSM-L] Unexpected behavior - Win2k3, TSM 5.4, NTFS permissions (score: 1)
Author: John Underdown <JohnUnderdown AT SYNOVUS DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:40:37 -0500
Steve, what size files do you backup using subfiles? we have disk only storage. Thanks, john We've used subfiles successfully for large files, but only because we were able to put large amount of fil
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-01/msg00234.html (15,848 bytes)

10. Re: [ADSM-L] Unexpected behavior - Win2k3, TSM 5.4, NTFS permissions (score: 1)
Author: "Schaub, Steve" <steve_schaub AT BCBST DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:41:20 -0500
We have since eliminated them, but we were using subfile on .pst files, some of which got up to 4gb. We also use it on access databases, which are in the same size category. -steve --Original Message
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-01/msg00241.html (16,628 bytes)

11. Re: [ADSM-L] Unexpected behavior - Win2k3, TSM 5.4, NTFS permissions (score: 1)
Author: Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:47:45 -0500
I didn't see any mention of this, but last time I checked, subfile was limited to files up to 2GB, not larger. We are also trying to figure out how to efficiently backup large .pst files (larger than
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-01/msg00242.html (17,339 bytes)

12. Re: [ADSM-L] Unexpected behavior - Win2k3, TSM 5.4, NTFS permissions (score: 1)
Author: Wanda Prather <wanda.prather AT JASI DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:23:38 -0500
Somewhat, but not entirely, if you are using real tape. (If you are using virtual tape, it just doesn't matter.) Day 1: When you use subfile backup, you get a base copy of the entire file the first b
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-01/msg00257.html (18,257 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu