Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Tsm\s+server\s+possibly\s+limiting\s+backup\s+performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Tsm\s+server\s+possibly\s+limiting\s+backup\s+performance\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Tsm server possibly limiting backup performance (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary D." <GLEE AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 09:33:11 -0400; Tsm server 6.2.2 OS redhat enterprise linux 6.0 Client tdp for exchange, sqlserver, and backup archive client Client connected via 1 gb ethernet connection. In my experience, I yhave never been able; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-05/msg00239.html (11,754 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] Tsm server possibly limiting backup performance (score: 1): Author: Richard Rhodes <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 10:09:31 -0400; A little more explanation is going to be needed. A 1GB ethernet is not going to give 800mb/s, let alone 200mb/s. 1GB ethernet is only going to provide one direction throughput of 110mb/s. Do you mean; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-05/msg00240.html (13,029 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] Tsm server possibly limiting backup performance (score: 1): Author: Paul Fielding <paul AT FIELDING DOT CA>; Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 08:29:54 -0600; I think clarification is needed on mb/s vs. MB/s. a 1gb (gigabit) (note lowercase) connection will certainly do 800 mb/s (megabit/s). it won't, however, do 800 MB/s (megabyte/s).... Paul On Fri, May; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-05/msg00241.html (14,006 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] Tsm server possibly limiting backup performance (score: 1): Author: David McClelland <tsm AT NETWORKC.CO DOT UK>; Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 15:28:25 +0100; To make sure we're all talking the same language here, can we agree that 'b' means 'bit' and 'B' means 'byte'? This conversation could get very confusing otherwise... /DMc On 27 May 2011, at 15:09, R; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-05/msg00242.html (13,986 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] Tsm server possibly limiting backup performance (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 10:49:40 -0400; The networking itself is just one element in the overall backup operation... You don't say what measurement point you are looking at for your throughput numbers. If it is the "Network data transfer r; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-05/msg00244.html (12,169 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] Tsm server possibly limiting backup performance (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary D." <GLEE AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 10:41:32 -0400; Sorry, thought I had my cases correct. 1 gb (gigabit) ethernet ocnnection. Ftp and other tests yielded 800 megabit performance, Tsm sessions average 200 to 250 megabit. Gary Lee Senior System Program; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-05/msg00245.html (14,635 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]