Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Tape\s+library\s+possible\s+replacement\s+\-\s+push\/pull\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Tape\s+library\s+possible\s+replacement\s+\-\s+push\/pull\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:43:15 -0500; As this project moves forward, I am doing more and more research since I am unfamiliar with this beast (3494 has been my baby since it was installed in 1995). The book talks about "*to communicate wi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-02/msg00015.html (21,486 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: "Ehresman,David E." <deehre01 AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:15:26 +0000; Why? Because its different than a 3494. It uses IP to provide a web pages for managing the library. It uses fibre channel to communicate with the host about tape mounts/dismounts as well as actual da; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-02/msg00016.html (22,313 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:15:46 -0500; The 3584 can use a FC interface to control the library, saving the need for an extra network path between your TSM server and the 3584 library. You will still likely want a network interface to the l; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-02/msg00017.html (23,395 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT JEFFERSONHOSPITAL DOT ORG>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:16:03 -0500; --Zoltan Forray wrote: -- FCP has a two level addressing structure: each storage device port is identified by a WWPN (World Wide Port Name), and each device supported by a given port is identified by; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-02/msg00018.html (14,338 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:06:39 +0100; Because that is the way a 3584 works. 'in band'. leftovers from when the 3584 was still midrange and midrange libraries are controlled in band. BTW, with modern ts3500's features like control path fa; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-02/msg00019.html (14,615 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:32:08 -0500; Thanks for the "explanations" but I still don't understand. Does the fibre channel connection replace the 3494 IP link? I think read that you still need IP for CLI? Are the drives still separate when; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-02/msg00020.html (16,320 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:43:36 +0100; yes, there is an IP interface (or usually even multiple for GUI and 'CLI' access as well as SNMP. there is some communications between the drives and the library, but as to which protocol is used I d; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-02/msg00021.html (17,547 bytes)
8. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Richard Rhodes <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:35:46 -0500; Your going to miss some aspects of your 3494 . . . . Here's how I understand things. The 3584 library is a SCSI library. As tape libraries began to multiply there was a need to make access to them ea; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-02/msg00023.html (27,220 bytes)
9. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Steve Roder <spr AT BUFFALO DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:59:43 -0500; Yes, the TSM server will be configured to talk to the Library Manager of the 3584 via scsi LUN1 of your tape drives, where scsi LUN0 is the drive. The 3584 is a typical SCSI tape library. The IP acce; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-02/msg00025.html (19,359 bytes)
10. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:09:29 -0500; Ah, that. :) I know what you're talking about, I have a 3494 and a 3584 ("TS3500"). The TS3500 is a subclass of "SCSI" libraries. The command channel which the 3494 performs over IP is done over the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-02/msg00026.html (13,903 bytes)
11. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:22:37 -0500; Well, it looks like this is going to happen and yes it will be a pull-out-3494-push-install-3584/TS3500. We are trying to make this transition as easy as possible so I have some questions about prepp; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-02/msg00120.html (19,950 bytes)
12. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT ICFI DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:02:32 +0000; Hi Zoltan, What is your plan if you have to do this for a DR drill? Shouldn't be any different. Use a select or a Q LIBV to get a list of all the tapes that are checked in with their "owner" attribut; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-02/msg00126.html (20,994 bytes)
13. [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:08:05 -0500; We are starting to examine the idea of replacing our aging 3494 (installed 1995) due to difficulty in getting parts and having more frequent outages due to robot issues. Since we have 17-TS1130 drive; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-01/msg00147.html (12,836 bytes)
14. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT JEFFERSONHOSPITAL DOT ORG>; Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:59:55 -0500; --Zoltan Forray wrote: -- TS3500 libraries are often equipped with a sort of virtualization facility, called ALMS, that allows setting up one or more logical libraries within a physical TS3500. If yo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-01/msg00148.html (13,720 bytes)
15. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT ICFI DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 03:01:50 +0000; Yep, pretty much that simple. Check the tapes out of one library, check them into another. No more complicated than if you are going to a DR site that has a 3584 rather than a 3494. TSM doesn't care.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-01/msg00149.html (14,182 bytes)
16. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Steven Harris <steve AT STEVENHARRIS DOT INFO>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:42:56 +1100; Zoltan, Please make your life easier by spending the small additional amount to get ALMS. It makes using the library so much simpler. Also for any advanced features, such as Storage frames you will f; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-01/msg00151.html (14,961 bytes)
17. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:30:18 -0500; Thanks for the details/reassurance. This sheds some light on possible issues that would make it difficult to do a push/pull, right now. filter in the library interface. If this is a absolute restrict; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-01/msg00152.html (16,599 bytes)
18. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:43:29 -0500; Thanks for the tip about ALMS. I saw it and figured I would need it..... As for replacing the TS1130 with TS1140 - . The cost is way out there. We just added 3-new TS1130 and upgraded some TS1120's w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-01/msg00153.html (17,672 bytes)
19. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: Nick Laflamme <nick AT LAFLAMME DOT US>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:56:44 -0600; If you need mount points, perhaps it's time to start looking at virtual tape libraries or other disk-based backup media. IBM will show you their ProtectTier line; EMC has a variety of DataDomain prod; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-01/msg00154.html (13,380 bytes)
20. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape library possible replacement - push/pull (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT ICFI DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:17:26 +0000; filter in the library interface. No, that's not an absolute restriction, it's just a convenience. It allows the case where operators throw scratch tapes into the physical I/O door and the library it; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-01/msg00155.html (16,371 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]