Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+TSM7\.1\.7\s+DB\s+growing\s+with\s+Dedup\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+TSM7\.1\.7\s+DB\s+growing\s+with\s+Dedup\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] TSM7.1.7 DB growing with Dedup (score: 1): Author: Bill Boyer <bjdboyer AT COMCAST DOT NET>; Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:03:20 -0400; I converted a server over to directory container polls and replication. Their previous FILE stgpool was around 140TB of data. After defining everything I used the TSMOC dialogs to enable replication; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2017-04/msg00017.html (11,410 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM7.1.7 DB growing with Dedup (score: 1): Author: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 08:02:08 +0200; Hi Bill, I don't know what is going on the the protect stgpool command vs replicate node in regards to DB usage but the conversion growth...i've been there a few times before, it happens with every c; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2017-04/msg00021.html (13,897 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM7.1.7 DB growing with Dedup (score: 1): Author: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:25:47 +0200; Bill, I forgot to link this document from IBM, some good info here : https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21992410 On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT gm; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2017-04/msg00022.html (14,698 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM7.1.7 DB growing with Dedup (score: 1): Author: Bill Boyer <bjdboyer AT COMCAST DOT NET>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 08:28:12 -0400; Offline re-org? Does that mean TSM needs to be down? I'm going to be verifying the DB2 database version/stats this morning. Thanks! Hi Bill, I don't know what is going on the the protect stgpool comm; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2017-04/msg00037.html (14,302 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM7.1.7 DB growing with Dedup (score: 1): Author: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:38:28 +0200; You're welcome Bill. And yes, you need to bring down TSM for an offline reorg, they are very fast however, especially if you run them on SSD's as a target location for the reorg and you do it one tab; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2017-04/msg00038.html (16,646 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM7.1.7 DB growing with Dedup (score: 1): Author: Bill Boyer <bjdboyer AT COMCAST DOT NET>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:11:40 -0400; We'll be doing this now as it turns out. The dbvolume ran out of space and the instance is down at the moment. As this was upgraded to the 7.1.7 version from a V6. You're welcome Bill. And yes, you n; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2017-04/msg00040.html (17,375 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]