Has anyone else observed that TSM only reads from COPY1 of a db volume mirror pair during DB backup? Why do you believe it should do otherwise? As exposited in the Admin Guide manual, mirroring is f
Author: Orville Lantto <orville.lantto AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:55:16 -0400
Reads should be safe from mirrored volumes and are commonly done in operating systems to load balance. Not taking advantage of the available IO resource is wasteful and puts an unnecessarily unbalanc
Reads should be safe from mirrored volumes and are commonly done in operating systems to load balance. Not taking advantage of the available IO resource is wasteful and puts an unnecessarily unbalan
Author: Orville Lantto <orville.lantto AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:22:04 -0400
Performance is the issue. As tapes get faster and faster, trying to get a db backup without "shoe-shining" the tape drive gets harder. Using storage sub-system mirroring is an option, but not the rec
Author: Paul van Dongen <Paul AT VANGUARD-IT.COM DOT BR>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:55:13 -0300
If it was't a dream, I remember reading something about this issue. It stated that this behaviour was "by design", because reading blocks from both copies of a mirrored volume cancelled all gains obt