Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+TSM\s+for\s+a\s+Disaster\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+TSM\s+for\s+a\s+Disaster\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] TSM for a Disaster (score: 1): Author: Joni Moyer <joni.moyer AT HIGHMARK DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:19:33 -0400; Hello everyone! I have the TSM database, recovery log, volume history, device configuration and drm plan replicated to our disaster recovery site. The TSM server is an AIX 5.3 server with TSM at 5.3.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-03/msg00359.html (14,754 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM for a Disaster (score: 1): Author: "Strand, Neil B." <NBStrand AT LMUS.LEGGMASON DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:42:51 -0400; Joni, That sounds great! What disk storage and replication are you using? Neil Strand Storage Engineer - Legg Mason Baltimore, MD. (410) 580-7491 Whatever you can do or believe you can, begin it. Bol; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-03/msg00360.html (16,171 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM for a Disaster (score: 1): Author: Joni Moyer <joni.moyer AT HIGHMARK DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:51:39 -0400; Hi Neil, Our disk is entirely EMC and we use SRDF/A for our Mainframe and SAN disk and Celerra Replication for our NAS environment. I was just wondering if it would be ok to remove all of the librari; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-03/msg00361.html (17,138 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM for a Disaster (score: 1): Author: "Strand, Neil B." <NBStrand AT LMUS.LEGGMASON DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:08:09 -0400; Joni, Should be fine. Just make sure that your device class points to the manual library. You may want to test a small scale DR recovery by creating a DR primary and copy pool and putting a single no; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-03/msg00362.html (19,417 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM for a Disaster (score: 1): Author: Joni Moyer <joni.moyer AT HIGHMARK DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:32:36 -0400; Hi Neil, Thanks for the advice! TSM v.6 sounds like it's going to be challenging yet bring a lot of improvements so it'll be nice when it is released! Have a good one! ** Joni Moyer Highmark Storage; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-03/msg00369.html (20,040 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM for a Disaster (score: 1): Author: Timothy Hughes <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:28:44 -0400; When is TSM v.6 going to be released? Sorry If that was mentioned before here, I missed it. Thanks Hi Neil, Thanks for the advice! TSM v.6 sounds like it's going to be challenging yet bring a lot of; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-03/msg00371.html (20,322 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM for a Disaster (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:45:06 +0100; Hi, the beta-program is just starting. Since this is the most major overhaul since version 1.1 (I guess) expect the beta-phase to take a while. I wouldn't hold your breath if I were you. Thanks -- M; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-03/msg00372.html (11,931 bytes)
8. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM for a Disaster (score: 1): Author: Shawn Drew <shawn.drew AT AMERICAS.BNPPARIBAS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:51:50 -0400; I think I read on this list that it is intended for Q4 2008 ________________________________________________ Shawn Drew Data Protection Engineer Core IT Production BNP Paribas RCC, Inc. Internet Timo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-03/msg00373.html (23,783 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]