Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+SV\:\s+TSM\s+6\.1\.3\.1\s+on\s+Windows\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+SV\:\s+TSM\s+6\.1\.3\.1\s+on\s+Windows\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] SV: TSM 6.1.3.1 on Windows? (score: 1): Author: Christian Svensson <Christian.Svensson AT CRISTIE DOT SE>; Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 13:37:52 +0100; Hi Remco, That shouldn't be necessary to do. And the library the customer is using don't have support for partitioning. I have set the LTO format in the Device Class and have been working since I sta; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-02/msg00086.html (14,282 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] SV: TSM 6.1.3.1 on Windows? (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>; Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 13:46:51 +0100; That confirms my ideas about how it should work. Even without partitioning, you can define two libraries, that are both controlled by the same control-path (device node in unix). That may be a workar; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-02/msg00087.html (15,699 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]