Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+SErvername\s+stanza\s+in\s+dsm\.opt\s+in\s+Unix\s+systems\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+SErvername\s+stanza\s+in\s+dsm\.opt\s+in\s+Unix\s+systems\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] SErvername stanza in dsm.opt in Unix systems (score: 1): Author: Mehdi Salehi <ezzobad AT GOOGLEMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:01:44 +1000; Hi, What is the reason to mention SErvername in dsm.opt in Unix? I have two records in dsm.sys for two TSM servers and I connect to them using -server=servername. But do not know the reason for serve; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-03/msg00307.html (11,695 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] SErvername stanza in dsm.opt in Unix systems (score: 1): Author: Jánský Vítzslav <Vitezslav.Jansky AT T-SYSTEMS DOT CZ>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:05:02 +0100; It's the default stanza name for dsmc. If you dont have one defined hostname will be used as servername. V.J. Hi, What is the reason to mention SErvername in dsm.opt in Unix? I have two records in ds; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-03/msg00308.html (12,279 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] SErvername stanza in dsm.opt in Unix systems (score: 1): Author: David McClelland <tsm AT NETWORKC.CO DOT UK>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:19:35 -0500; Unix is inherently a multi-user system. dsm.sys is the 'system'-wide options file - dsm.opt is the user-specific options file and points to a particular stanza in the dsm.sys file. Potentially, every; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-03/msg00309.html (12,926 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] SErvername stanza in dsm.opt in Unix systems (score: 1): Author: Mehdi Salehi <ezzobad AT GOOGLEMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:34:10 +1000; Thanks for the info, but why B/A client for Windows doesn't have such a flexibility to separate system-wide and user-wide config files? Don't say windows in not multi-user ;); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-03/msg00311.html (11,754 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] SErvername stanza in dsm.opt in Unix systems (score: 1): Author: Lindsay Morris <lindsay AT TSMWORKS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:39:28 -0400; It does, but you have to do it differently. Unix: one big dsm.sys with several stanzas each starting with "SERVERNAME"; use the -servername switch on dsmc to indicate which stanza to use. Windows: ds; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-03/msg00312.html (12,414 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] SErvername stanza in dsm.opt in Unix systems (score: 1): Author: David McClelland <tsm AT NETWORKC.CO DOT UK>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:45:05 -0500; You might have to ask IBM that one, I'm sure it's a hangover from the days when ADSM was first kicking around when Windows was much less of a multi-user system than now. Instead, as already stated el; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-03/msg00313.html (12,373 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] SErvername stanza in dsm.opt in Unix systems (score: 1): Author: Mehdi Salehi <ezzobad AT GOOGLEMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:57:40 +1000; Thanks so much.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-03/msg00314.html (11,710 bytes)
8. Re: [ADSM-L] SErvername stanza in dsm.opt in Unix systems (score: 1): Author: Erwann Simon <erwann.simon AT FREE DOT FR>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:00:42 +0100; If you're using dsmadmc, -servername option does the trick. But if your're using dsmc/dsmj, the -optfile option seems a better choice, event on a Unix system as it's the only way to read the options; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2010-03/msg00315.html (13,210 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]