Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+RMAN\s+direct\s+to\s+NFS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+RMAN\s+direct\s+to\s+NFS\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: bkupmstr <tsm-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:08:48 -0700; Anyone out here thinking of sending oracle backup data direct to an NFS target? Care to elaborate? What is driving the process? TSM licensing ? DBA control? +-- +--; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00046.html (11,710 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: "Hart, Charles A" <charles_hart AT UHC DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:15:39 -0500; This would be interesting to hear .. we were looking at it to reduce the VTL overhead and complexity... Our DBA's diudnt want to do cause theyd have to manage their backup space. argggg Anyone out he; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00047.html (12,796 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: Grigori Solonovitch <Grigori.Solonovitch AT AHLIUNITED DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 23:25:14 +0300; Maybe I am wrong, but RMAN is not able to backup databases directly to NFS file systems. Options are: local disk or TSM. By the way, TSM can be configured to use FILE pool using NFS mounted file syst; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00048.html (13,507 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: Richard Rhodes <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:50:34 -0400; We just tested this. We sent RMAN backups directly to a NFS mounted filesystem with no problems. Rick Maybe I am wrong, but RMAN is not able to backup databases directly to NFS file systems. Options; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00051.html (14,645 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: Nick Laflamme <dplaflamme AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:00:48 -0500; I've seen Oracle propose backups from RMAN to NFS-mounted file spaces as the best solution in a proposed configuration. This was an Exadata configuration, but, RMAN is RMAN. Sigh, Nick; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00052.html (13,333 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: Grigori Solonovitch <Grigori.Solonovitch AT AHLIUNITED DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:29:15 +0300; But keep in mind next "Extremely Poor RMAN Backup Performance to NFS After Upgrade to 10.2 [ID 413098.1]" Grigori G. Solonovitch Senior Technical Architect Ahli United Bank Kuwait www.ahliunited.com.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00053.html (16,130 bytes)
7. [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: bkupmstr <tsm-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:18:30 -0700; Chart2: what Vtl are you currently using and what does it cause a lot of overhead and complexity? +-- +--; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00056.html (12,091 bytes)
8. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: "Hart, Charles A" <charles_hart AT UHC DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:29:57 -0500; The IBM one, the reason I said overhead and complexity 1) We have 40 VTL's for 2) 5120 Configured Vtape Drives 3) More than 10,000 TSM Tape Drive Paths 4) 100 TSM Instances that share all the above I; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00057.html (13,312 bytes)
9. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: Alex Paschal <apaschal5 AT FRONTIER DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:19:56 -0700; Wow. Charles, do you mind if we grill you about your environment? Is it simply size that pushes you to scale to that many VTLs and TSM instances, or is it some other consideration? 1) We have 40 VTL'; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00058.html (13,788 bytes)
10. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: "Hart, Charles A" <charles_hart AT UHC DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:42:25 -0500; It's a size thing .. We average 190TB per night for incremental, and 480TB on the weekends (db fulls) across 4 primary DC's. We also have 4 fully populated STK sl8500 and two TS3500's for Offsite Cop; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00059.html (15,323 bytes)
11. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: Nick Laflamme <dplaflamme AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:10:47 -0500; This is more about VTLs than TSM, but I have a couple of questions, influenced by my shop's experience with VTLs. 1) When you say "40 VTLs," I presume that's on far fewer frames, that you're using se; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00061.html (14,119 bytes)
12. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: Richard Rhodes <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:07:24 -0400; Compared to what you guys are describing, we are a small. We run 10 main TSM servers, 50tb/night, 3000 nodes, 2 x 3584 libs with 50 drives each, and now we've added 4 DataDomains. We replicate betwe; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00063.html (18,386 bytes)
13. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: Shawn Drew <shawn.drew AT AMERICAS.BNPPARIBAS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:02:26 -0400; I haven't tried it myself on a file pool, but couldn't you update the device class of the datadomain pool to have a mountlimit of 0 ? "- No way to take the DD file pool offline. You can mark it "unav; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00064.html (19,308 bytes)
14. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: "Schneider, Jim" <jschneider AT USSCO DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:27:06 -0400; One Data Domain Fun Fact for you: When you upgrade the DD OS you will have to remount all of the NFS shares on the servers that write to it directly. Jim Schneider Compared to what you guys are descr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00065.html (19,062 bytes)
15. Re: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS (score: 1): Author: "Hart, Charles A" <charles_hart AT UHC DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:29:29 -0500; Hi Nick 1) We only carve out 1 vtape lib per 7650 - we then share that library with 2-4 TSM instances on one AIX server, some installations will have two 7650's to a aix p6 650. 2) 128 Drives was jus; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-07/msg00066.html (16,545 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]