Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+NDMP\s+backups\s+Restore\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+NDMP\s+backups\s+Restore\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] NDMP backups Restore (score: 1): Author: Nick Marouf <marouf AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 06:55:30 -0600; Hello ADSM, We are currently migrating away from Netapps, (NDMP to tape) to a new store subsystem ( Infinidat) My belief is that since NDMP is a common protocol, we should be able to restore those vi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00015.html (10,156 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] NDMP backups Restore (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:46:48 +0200; I think you find that computer says nooooo. Im guessing that your current NDMP dumps are in NetApp format, so you can possibly restore those to every NetApp you wish, but nothing else. -- Met vriend; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00016.html (11,026 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] NDMP backups Restore (score: 1): Author: "Huebner, Andy" <andy.huebner AT NOVARTIS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:23:58 +0000; My understanding is NDMP is a standard for the transport of data, not the format of the data. I would not expect an NDMP backup from one vendor to work on the next vendor. As an example: NetApp suppo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00017.html (12,659 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] NDMP backups Restore (score: 1): Author: Skylar Thompson <skylar2 AT U.WASHINGTON DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 08:28:25 -0700; Yep, this is correct. It is one of the reasons I have avoided NDMP backups in favor of NFS/CIFS backups. -- -- Skylar Thompson (skylar2 AT u.washington DOT edu) -- Genome Sciences Department, System; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00018.html (13,530 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] NDMP backups Restore (score: 1): Author: "Rhodes, Richard L." <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:45:52 +0000; I found this comment from NetApp: So it sounds line the NetApp data format is Solaris dump format. Rick Yep, this is correct. It is one of the reasons I have avoided NDMP backups in favor of NFS/CIFS; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00019.html (13,520 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] NDMP backups Restore (score: 1): Author: Shawn DREW <shawn.drew AT US.BNPPARIBAS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:49:50 +0000; This is a long way from TSM allowing you to restore a backup from a "NetApp Dump" storage pool to a non-Netapp appliance. I am skeptical but haven't tried it myself. I found this comment from NetApp:; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00020.html (13,032 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] NDMP backups Restore (score: 1): Author: "Huebner, Andy" <andy.huebner AT NOVARTIS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 20:06:48 +0000; I believe that (ufsdump) is referring to the target and the format the data will be sent in. Not the source. In the olden days when I had a Celerra and used NDMP, the full dump started at block 1 and; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00022.html (13,960 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]