Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Moving\s+from\s+Generictape\s+device\s+class\s+to\s+LTO\s+device\s+class\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Moving\s+from\s+Generictape\s+device\s+class\s+to\s+LTO\s+device\s+class\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Moving from Generictape device class to LTO device class (score: 1): Author: Kelly Lipp <lipp AT STORSERVER DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 14:13:14 -0600; Folks, About five months ago, I created a device class of generictape to use LTO4 drives in a new STORServer I built. Now, with the newest version of TSM, LTO4 is supported and the library knows abou; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-09/msg00068.html (11,838 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] Moving from Generictape device class to LTO device class (score: 1): Author: Ibán Bernaldo de Quirós Márquez <Iban.Bernaldodequiros AT SUN DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 22:44:10 +0200; Are they LTO drives from IBM ż? Were you using the generic device driver of the OS or were you using the IBM device driver ż? Depending on how it was configured we can try one way or another ... Let; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-09/msg00069.html (12,691 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] Moving from Generictape device class to LTO device class (score: 1): Author: Kelly Lipp <lipp AT STORSERVER DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:00:08 -0600; Iban, We were using the IBM driver but the generictape in TSM. Yes, they are IBM LTO4 drives. Kelly J. Lipp VP Manufacturing & CTO STORServer, Inc. 485-B Elkton Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80907 719-2; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-09/msg00070.html (13,084 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] Moving from Generictape device class to LTO device class (score: 1): Author: Ibán Bernaldo de Quirós Márquez <Iban.Bernaldodequiros AT SUN DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 23:48:36 +0200; In my opinion, The only thing you can do is to create new pools with new device class and format LTO4 and put the new pools in production. Then you have to set the nextstgpool parameter of old stgpoo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-09/msg00072.html (14,361 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] Moving from Generictape device class to LTO device class (score: 1): Author: Ibán Bernaldo de Quirós Márquez <Iban.Bernaldodequiros AT SUN DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 00:06:05 +0200; Kelly, I forget one last important thing. You will have to create a new library containing the devclass and the new pools. If you have similar device class(devices) in a library TSM will not detect w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-09/msg00074.html (14,280 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] Moving from Generictape device class to LTO device class (score: 1): Author: Kelly Lipp <lipp AT STORSERVER DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:19:42 -0600; Iban, That's what I had already concluded. And the real problem is TSM refuses to stick a tape associated with a generictape device class into an LTO drive, no matter what you do! And even if I defin; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-09/msg00075.html (15,339 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]