Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Mainframe\/TSM\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Mainframe\/TSM\s+Question\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Mainframe/TSM Question (score: 1): Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:52:57 -0800; I am in a fight to, what looks like, justify why we should keep TSM and not move everything to netbackup. But without going into details (very long and aggravating story in which I may have to leave; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-02/msg00355.html (11,783 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] Mainframe/TSM Question (score: 1): Author: Mark Stapleton <Mark.Stapleton AT CDW DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:17:56 -0600; TSM runs nicely on the mainframe (that's where it started), and it will talk to LTO/3590 libraries well (I'd stay with IBM hardware to be on the safe side). -- Mark Stapleton System engineer, CDW I a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-02/msg00356.html (12,628 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] Mainframe/TSM Question (score: 1): Author: Wanda Prather <wprather AT JASI DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:47:29 -0500; z/OS has no support for LTO, so TSM on z/OS doesn't support LTO. . You can install a TSM server on z/OS and have it use the 3590 drives along with the mainframe (naturally you might need more, but us; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-02/msg00358.html (12,545 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] Mainframe/TSM Question (score: 1): Author: Alex Paschal <apaschal AT MSIINET DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:45:03 -0600; A better question might be: how are they justifying converting everything to netbackup? I am in a fight to, what looks like, justify why we should keep TSM and not move everything to netbackup. But w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-02/msg00359.html (12,909 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] Mainframe/TSM Question (score: 1): Author: Alex Paschal <apaschal AT MSIINET DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:55:04 -0600; Sorry, accidentally hit Send. I love Outlook. I meant to finish with.... A better question might be: how are they justifying converting everything to netbackup? If there's no justification for netbac; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-02/msg00360.html (13,902 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] Mainframe/TSM Question (score: 1): Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:02:00 -0800; This the exact question I was going to ask when I got in this meeting, which I thought was supposed to be today but nobody has shown up yet. Instead of coming to me to talk about TSM they went to a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-02/msg00361.html (12,413 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] Mainframe/TSM Question (score: 1): Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:07:36 -0800; I also kept it and sent it yesterday in my response. I suspect there is a giant "CYA" going on because I added some other facts, which is probably why nobody has dropped by yet. Geoff Gill TSM Admin; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-02/msg00362.html (11,607 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]