Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+LTO4\s+and\s+TSM\s+Encryption\s+of\s+Storage\s+Pool\s+Volumes\s+and\s+DB\s+Backup\s+Tapes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+LTO4\s+and\s+TSM\s+Encryption\s+of\s+Storage\s+Pool\s+Volumes\s+and\s+DB\s+Backup\s+Tapes\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] LTO4 and TSM Encryption of Storage Pool Volumes and DB Backup Tapes (score: 1): Author: Kelly Lipp <lipp AT STORSERVER DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:19:46 -0600; Folks, I'm trying to plug the hole in the system here. With TSM V5.3.5.2 and 5.4.0.2 LTO4 drives and their encryption functionality can finally be exploited at the application level. Within TSM, we u; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-08/msg00152.html (12,260 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] LTO4 and TSM Encryption of Storage Pool Volumes and DB Backup Tapes (score: 1): Author: "Strand, Neil B." <NBStrand AT LMUS.LEGGMASON DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:22:36 -0400; Kelly, I'm using TS1120 drives and wrestled with the same issues. I ended up using system encryption with the EKM because: 1. It provides the greatest level of granularity - Individual tape drives an; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-08/msg00158.html (15,251 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]