Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+HSM\s+practical\s+limit\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+HSM\s+practical\s+limit\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] HSM practical limit? (score: 1): Author: Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:05:12 -0400; We're considering using HSM for storing large object-size files. I'm curious if folks using HSM have comments on what the practical object limit is for one HSM-managed filesystem. I.e., how many obje; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00164.html (11,307 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] HSM practical limit? (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:56:25 -0400; Paul - Speaking from experience running HSM on AIX JFS for many years: Applied to a file system, HSM turns it into the slowest you've ever experienced, even on the fastest RS/6000 and disk systems. T; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00172.html (11,549 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] HSM practical limit? (score: 1): Author: "Stapleton, Mark" <mark.stapleton AT BERBEE DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:57:07 -0500; I just want to toss in my two cents on a procedural issue: HSM is a legacy infrastructure that was originally implemented for mainframe systems 50 years ago. It was built in a day when hard disk was; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00186.html (12,370 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] HSM practical limit? (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:01:40 -0400; Mark - I agree with your point that modern disk is cheap to purchase, which can reduce the value of HSM. However, many computer rooms are struggling with the heat and power issues of a lot of rack mo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00192.html (11,878 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] HSM practical limit? (score: 1): Author: Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:05:48 -0400; Mark, I agree that HSM's value has diminished over time, and I also question whether there is still a place for it. We used TSM's HSM once before, many years ago, and abandoned it when the cost of di; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00197.html (12,528 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] HSM practical limit? (score: 1): Author: Anker Lerret <ADSM-L AT LERRET DOT US>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:24:47 -0400; HSM has been nothing but a headache for us. It's a vicious, horrible piece of code. We've been running TSM for 8 years and have been very, very happy with it--except for the data that was lost in an; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-07/msg00200.html (11,211 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]