Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Extra\s+client\s+sessions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Extra\s+client\s+sessions\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT JEFFERSON DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:40:30 +0000; We are occasionally seeing some odd behavior in our TSM environment. We write incoming client files to sequential disk storage pools. Almost all of our client nodes use the default maxnummp value of; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00076.html (13,258 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:19:25 -0400; AHA - so I am not loosing my mind (at least in this situation). I too have been seeing clients getting >3-sessions eventhough the NODE maxnumpoints is 1! I was always under the impression that maxnum; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00077.html (15,141 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: Karel Bos <tsm.wad AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 23:22:19 +0200; Might want to check resourceutil settings as that limits the number of sessions clients try to setup. It should match maxnummp or be lower. Op 31 aug. 2016 22:21 schreef "Zoltan Forray" <zforray AT v; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00078.html (16,926 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:36:02 -0400; Yes, do not use a RESOURCEUTILIZATION higher than the MAXNUMMP setting. Having said that, there is an APAR that might ("might" is the operative word!) be a match for this issue, IT16004: https://www.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-08/msg00079.html (19,136 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: "Rhodes, Richard L." <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:18:48 +0000; We see this behavior. It happens once per week or so, usually with Windows servers, but not exclusively. I've seen servers with 20-30-40 sessions. It happens with enough regularity that I put in a sc; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00000.html (13,507 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 08:40:33 -0400; Thanks for the info. Yes the user does(did) have RESOURCEUTILIZATION 4 configured. I note the APAR you refer to is still open. It refers to v7.1 but how far back does it go? The client recently upgra; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00003.html (21,796 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:10:07 -0400; Hi Zoltan, Yes, if MAXNUMMP is too low to accommodate a non-default RESOURCEUTILIZATION value, then while the backup should work okay, you may see some warning messages about there being insufficient; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00025.html (25,149 bytes)
8. Re: [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 08:19:42 -0400; Hi Andy, But my point is that the user is getting whatever they set for RESOURCEUTILIZATION vs what I set for MAXNUMPOINT, without the noise. This user is running 4-multi terabyte backup streams sinc; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00028.html (28,533 bytes)
9. Re: [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 08:56:13 -0400; Hi Zoltan, Is your user doing proxied sessions? If yes, where is the MAXNUMMP configured: on the agent node (NODENAME aaaaa)? Or the target node (ASNODENAME bbbbb)? You need to ensure that the target; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00030.html (32,436 bytes)
10. Re: [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 09:04:23 -0400; Andy, No proxies in use for any backups. Here is their whole dsm.sys (Linux/Centos). No, I do not know what their pre/post commands do... SErvername PROCESSOR COMMmethod TCPip TCPPort 1500 TCPServera; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00031.html (39,792 bytes)
11. Re: [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: Karel Bos <tsm.wad AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:12:09 +0200; Keep in mind maxnummp is ignored when going to random access storage like disk pool. Op 7 sep. 2016 15:07 schreef "Zoltan Forray" <zforray AT vcu DOT edu>:; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00032.html (43,969 bytes)
12. Re: [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 09:35:30 -0400; Say what? Where is that documented? From the book: *Server settings take precedence over client settings. If the client resourceutilization option value exceeds the value of the server MAXNUMMP setti; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00033.html (12,982 bytes)
13. Re: [ADSM-L] Extra client sessions (score: 1): Author: Karel Bos <tsm.wad AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:28:48 +0200; Among places like https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.1/com.ibm.itsm.srv.doc/t_simulwrite_client_mountpts.html "A client session requires a mount point to store data to a sequentia; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2016-09/msg00036.html (14,029 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]