Author: "Loon, EJ van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:23:23 +0200
Hi *SM-ers! I have to delete an old library, containing a copypool. I can delete all volumes one-by-one but I wonder, is there a quicker/easier way to delete a complete copypool? Thanks for any help
Author: Henrik Vahlstedt <SHWL AT STATOILHYDRO DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:34:40 +0200
Short answer, no. //Henrik Hi *SM-ers! I have to delete an old library, containing a copypool. I can delete all volumes one-by-one but I wonder, is there a quicker/easier way to delete a complete cop
Author: "Strand, Neil B." <NBStrand AT LMUS.LEGGMASON DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:53:13 -0400
EJ, If you are running an older version of TSM you will want to upgrade prior to manually deleting. Reference: IC50659: AE IC47491 FIX COMPLETION - TSM SERVER HANG AFTER DELETE VOLUME COMMAND(S) ISSU
Author: "Loon, EJ van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:43:25 +0200
Hi Christian! I'm currently deleting the volumes through a macro file. It will probably run for several hours (400+ tapes) but it seems to be the only way. Thanks! Kind regards, Eric van Loon KLM Roy
Author: Henrik Vahlstedt <SHWL AT STATOILHYDRO DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:05:15 +0200
Hi, The benefit from running delete volume from a script outside TSM, where the script starts a new session per volume you delete. Is that you avoid the infamous dead lock you will get when you rapid
Author: "Loon, EJ van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:39:51 +0200
Hi Hendrik! Thanks for the tip! I'm running the deletes sequentially by using the wait=yes parameter since I encountered these deadlock problems in the past. Kind regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dut