Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Data\s+Domain\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Data\s+Domain\s+Question\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Data Domain Question (score: 1): Author: "Lamb, Charles P." <cplamb AT NPPD DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:18:49 -0600; Hi.... We are an IBM shop. We were wondering if anyone is using data domain material with their TSM system?? We were wonder about interoperability and any operational concerns with adding a 3rd party; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00184.html (11,400 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] Data Domain Question (score: 1): Author: "Hart, Charles A" <charles_hart AT UHC DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:58:58 -0600; General VTL Response, not using Data Domain with TSM using it on Netbackup. We are using the "Other" de-duping product Diligent Protectier which works with TSM on p570's the challenge for us is that; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00188.html (12,774 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] Data Domain Question (score: 1): Author: Kelly Lipp <lipp AT STORSERVER DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:44:03 -0700; There was a lengthy discussion six or so weeks ago on this topic. Perhaps head to the list archives and check out that discussion. It didn't touch, much, on specific connectivity, etc., but went into; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00189.html (12,134 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] Data Domain Question (score: 1): Author: Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:27:27 -0500; There are actually quite a few de-duping storage products on the market now. IBM also discussed TSM-based dedup possibilities at the Oxford TSM Symposium a couple of months ago. -- Paul Zarnowski Ph:; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00196.html (11,942 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] Data Domain Question (score: 1): Author: Curtis Preston <cpreston AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:22:57 -0500; Really! What did they say? They've been rather tight-lipped elsewhere. -- W. Curtis Preston Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies There are actually quite a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00236.html (12,025 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] Data Domain Question (score: 1): Author: Curtis Preston <cpreston AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:53:10 -0500; Charles, The one thing to be aware of with any dedupe offering is that when using a dedupe system with TSM, you will get significantly smaller dedupe ratios than those customers using it with Grandfa; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00237.html (13,827 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] Data Domain Question (score: 1): Author: "Colwell, William F." <bcolwell AT DRAPER DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:06:00 -0500; Curtis, the Oxford 2007 presentations are available at http://tsm-symposium.oucs.ox.ac.uk/2007contributions.html Review the ones by Dave Cannon and Freddy Saldana, they are very good with lots of inf; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00238.html (12,742 bytes)
8. Re: [ADSM-L] Data Domain Question (score: 1): Author: Curtis Preston <cpreston AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:56:27 -0500; Thanks, Bill! That's great stuff. It's good to see that they see dedupe as a key feature. As he says, it won't benefit TSM customers as much as others, but it will still benefit them. It's interestin; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00239.html (13,983 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]