Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Anybody\s+not\s+happy\s+with\s+TSM\s+V6\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Anybody not happy with TSM V6? (score: 1)
Author: Johnny Lea <jlea AT UMC DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:57:50 -0600
I know I should probably upgrade to v6 but I've been really happy with 5.5. When version 6.1 came out I played around with it but couldn't get everything working properly and didn't spend a lot of ti
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-01/msg00126.html (11,543 bytes)

2. Re: [ADSM-L] Anybody not happy with TSM V6? (score: 1)
Author: Robert Ouzen <rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:15:42 +0000
Hi johnny I have the same environment less nodes, my TSM V5.5 works fine and have the same wondering ! I planned to do it in a week or two but I am not happy about it. Really no want to spend time of
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-01/msg00129.html (12,464 bytes)

3. Re: [ADSM-L] Anybody not happy with TSM V6? (score: 1)
Author: "Arbogast, Warren K" <warbogas AT INDIANA DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:01:41 +0000
Johnny, We are very happy with TSM V6.2.2.0. We upgraded from v5.5 to v 6.2.2.0 in December. It has been at least as stable and trouble-free as v5. No major problems, and no regrets. The run time of
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-01/msg00145.html (11,533 bytes)

4. Re: [ADSM-L] Anybody not happy with TSM V6? (score: 1)
Author: Hans Christian Riksheim <bullhcr AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:30:50 +0100
We are mostly happy with our upgrade to 6.2.2 on AIX, but keep in mind that 6.2.2 likes to have a lot of CPU so maybe an upgrade to Power7 should be considered. Expiration is normally run much quicke
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-01/msg00146.html (12,536 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu