Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Active\s+Storage\s+Pools\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Active\s+Storage\s+Pools\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Active Storage Pools (score: 1): Author: Nick Laflamme <nick AT LAFLAMME DOT US>; Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 05:41:45 -0600; Does anyone have much experience with active storage pools? My current customer isnt allowed to reclaim tapes, so their inventory of primary storage volumes is much larger than their ATL. This makes; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-11/msg00054.html (12,486 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] Active Storage Pools (score: 1): Author: Steven Harris <steve AT STEVENHARRIS DOT INFO>; Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 23:14:40 +1100; Hi Nick It sounds like you are between a rock and a hard place. Are the lawyers really allowed to obstruct normal operations like that? Not reclaiming will cause the number of tapes required for a co; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-11/msg00055.html (14,221 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] Active Storage Pools (score: 1): Author: Shawn DREW <shawn.drew AT US.BNPPARIBAS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 18:27:43 +0000; I would just mark all the tapes that are not in the library as "unavailable", then run your "copy activedata". When It finishes, eject as many tapes as you can and put in other tapes. It will tell yo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-11/msg00062.html (15,007 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] Active Storage Pools (score: 1): Author: Nick Laflamme <nick AT LAFLAMME DOT US>; Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 14:51:18 -0600; Forgive me for asking, but is this based on experience? I ask because some administrative processes aren't that graceful about unavailable tapes. (RECLAIM STG comes to mind.); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2013-11/msg00064.html (11,541 bytes)
5. [ADSM-L] Active Storage Pools (score: 1): Author: Howard Coles <Howard.Coles AT ARDENTHEALTH DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:08:54 -0500; I have a couple of questions about this "feature" as I'd like to take advantage of it. 1. Is anyone on the list here actually using it? 2. Is there a way just to copy a node's data (not all the nodes; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-09/msg00105.html (10,819 bytes)
6. [ADSM-L] Active Storage Pools (score: 1): Author: cpreston <tsm-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:01:04 -0400; Looks like the answer to #1 is No. ;) I've tried to talk a number of TSM admins into this, and so far haven't gotten any takers. They tell me that the challenge is that it is another administrative t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-09/msg00263.html (11,729 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] Active Storage Pools (score: 1): Author: fastweb <mariomarini_000 AT FASTWEBNET DOT IT>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:03:49 +0200; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit *Unsubscribe* cpreston ha scritto: Nessun virus nel messaggio; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-09/msg00304.html (12,896 bytes)
8. Re: [ADSM-L] Active Storage Pools (score: 1): Author: "Bos, Karel" <Karel.Bos AT ATOSORIGIN DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:57:01 +0200; It would be that more pratical if you could just update your diskpool with something like "upd stg XX cache=yes activestorage=yes", leaving just cached copies of the active version on disk. cpreston; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-09/msg00305.html (12,793 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]