Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+ANR3497W\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] ANR3497W (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT JEFFERSON DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:11:18 +0000
We have a number of TSM server instances running under zSeries Linux. These were created with 6.2.2.0 server codes, subsequently upgraded to 6.2.5.0, and upgraded to 6.3.5.0 in early April. One of th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-04/msg00110.html (12,318 bytes)

2. Re: [ADSM-L] ANR3497W (score: 1)
Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:25:13 -0400
I can relate. See the same thing every day. When upgrading to 6.3.5.100, IBM/Tivoli by default disable almost all database reorgs by adding these to the dsmserv.opt: DISABLEREORGTable DISABLEREORGInd
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-04/msg00111.html (14,115 bytes)

3. Re: [ADSM-L] ANR3497W (score: 1)
Author: Krzysztof Przygoda <przygod AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:28:59 +0200
Hi I got similar upgrade quite recently. In my case I went to second scenario from your list (finally it took less than 1 hour to reorg index of BACKUP_OBJECTS of 200GB 4 year old DB previously runni
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-04/msg00112.html (13,539 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu