Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+2nd\s+Instance\s+of\s+TSM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+2nd\s+Instance\s+of\s+TSM\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] 2nd Instance of TSM (score: 1): Author: Adrian Compton <acompton AT ASPENPHARMA DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:05:44 +0200; Hi all I am considering a 2nd Instance of TSM on the same AIX 5.3 server. I have a TS3310 tape library with 6 drives, which will obviously have to be shared with the 1st instance. I am considering th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00281.html (12,435 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] 2nd Instance of TSM (score: 1): Author: Steven Langdale <Steven.Langdale AT CAT DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:21:22 +0000; Hello Whilst splitting your server may help with some stuff like inventory expiration etc because of the smaller DB size. I can't see it reducing your offsite copy time. The same amount of data needs; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00282.html (13,377 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] 2nd Instance of TSM (score: 1): Author: Adrian Compton <acompton AT ASPENPHARMA DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:30:31 +0200; You are quite right Steven. It is still the same amount of data. I have now noticed that my (2 x 1.5 TB each) SAN DISKPOOL is taking forever to migrate to copy pool offsite each day. Seems to get slo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-11/msg00283.html (14,275 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]