Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\?\?\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. ??? (score: 1): Author: Galen Johnson <gjohnson AT trantor DOT org>; Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 16:39:29 -0400; Hey folks, I'm curious about the way amanda backs up. If I'm reading the docs, list and other resources correctly, AMANDA requires at least 1 disklist entry per partition being backed up. It requires; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00213.html (14,180 bytes)
2. RE: ??? (score: 1): Author: "Bort, Paul" <pbort AT tmwsystems DOT com>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:15:18 -0400; You generally only need more than one entry if you're dividing a disk into small chunks to fit on your tape. You need to change tapes between 'amdump' calls, or oftener if you set runtapes > 1. That; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00214.html (13,513 bytes)
3. Re: ??? (score: 1): Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:29:54 -0400; [ snip ] Frosted!! A single amdump does all disklist entries to a single tape (unless it overflows and is allowed to use more tapes per run -- runtapes param). When using tar, a disklist entry may be; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00215.html (15,209 bytes)
4. Re: ??? (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene_heskett AT iolinc DOT net>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 18:58:45 -0400; This is wheat and this is frosted Frosted :-) You'll prefer to have at least 2x dumpcycle*runspercycle tapes in the rotation if you think about the ramifications of overwriting your last full backup; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00219.html (16,630 bytes)
5. Re: ??? (score: 1): Author: Galen Johnson <gjohnson AT trantor DOT org>; Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 21:20:09 -0400; Also, I currently am using a 7 tape changer (which I think I have mtx talking to nicely but with some small eccentricities). I currently have it setup as follows: dumpcycle 1 week runspercycle 6 tap; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00224.html (12,998 bytes)
6. Re: ??? (score: 1): Author: Galen Johnson <gjohnson AT trantor DOT org>; Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 21:39:40 -0400; Which side is right (the wheat or frosted ;-) )? I don't know why I'm having so much trouble with this but I suspect it's information overload. Frosted!! A single amdump does all disklist entries to; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00225.html (18,041 bytes)
7. Re: ??? (score: 1): Author: Galen Johnson <gjohnson AT trantor DOT org>; Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 21:49:16 -0400; Hey folks, This is wheat I'm curious about the way amanda backs up. If I'm reading the docs, list and other resources correctly, AMANDA requires at least 1 disklist entry per partition being backed; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00226.html (20,271 bytes)
8. Re: ??? (score: 1): Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 22:11:05 -0400; My personal sysadmin philosophy is to keep system directories for vendor supplied system software. Added software goes into its own tree(s) like /usr/local or /opt (different fs's then / or /usr). YM; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00227.html (11,296 bytes)
9. Re: ??? (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene_heskett AT iolinc DOT net>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 00:03:26 -0400; Gaaccckkk! Suffice to say that to amanda, hardware compression strikes a pretty crippling blow because amanda counts bytes *sent to the tape* and with hardware compression on, there are many current; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00228.html (20,488 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]