Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\*\*\*The\s+JOURNALED\s+BACKUP\s+saga\s+continues\.\.\.\*\*\*\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\*\*\*The\s+JOURNALED\s+BACKUP\s+saga\s+continues\.\.\.\*\*\*\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: "Malbrough, Demetrius" <DMalbrough AT TTIINC DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:22:13 -0600; **Any *SMers using NT Journal Backups** **This question is posed to Tivoli Client Development [Andy Raibeck] or Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development [Pete Tanenhaus] if possible!!!!** -- --; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00525.html (15,144 bytes)
2. Re: ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:37:23 -0500; Minor point: Pete and I both work in the same group; it is just our sig information that differs. :-) It would help to know which TSM server version you are using, and what your tsmjbbd.ini file look; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00528.html (16,903 bytes)
3. ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: Pete Tanenhaus <tanenhau AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:18:57 -0500; Answers/Comments to questions...... also needed Agreed. I am working on developing a redbook with guidelines for understanding and deploying Journal Based Backup. objects This is an ideal environment; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00586.html (19,938 bytes)
4. Re: ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: Bill Colwell <bcolwell AT DRAPER DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:47:55 -0500; <snip> This is a definitely a client-centric view! From my server-centric view I think the primary benefit is the elimiation of the server processing to generate and download the whole activeset meta; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00596.html (12,895 bytes)
5. Re: ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: "Malbrough, Demetrius" <DMalbrough AT TTIINC DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 14:29:58 -0600; Thanks, Andy & Pete!!!! I overlooked the fact that the server also had to be at 4.2.1 as well as the client for the Journal Based Backup to work! Where is this documented?? I am at 4.1.2.0 on my AIX; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00602.html (11,973 bytes)
6. ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: Pete Tanenhaus [mailto:tanenhau AT US.IBM DOT COM]; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:13:40 -0500; Answers/Comments to questions...... also needed Agreed. I am working on developing a redbook with guidelines for understanding and deploying Journal Based Backup. objects This is an ideal environment; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00603.html (20,045 bytes)
7. Re: ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: Dylan Ryback <dryback AT HOME DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:50:28 -0700; I think you have a valid beef. I don't believe it's mentioned in the documentation other than in the 'README.1st' file that's on the FTP site.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00606.html (11,898 bytes)
8. Re: ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: "Malbrough, Demetrius" <DMalbrough AT TTIINC DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:13:40 -0500; be is "Tivoli and journaling be exists 01/10/2002 -- objects still; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00607.html (22,883 bytes)
9. Re: ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: Niklas Lundstrom <niklas.lundstrom AT FORENINGSSPARBANKEN DOT SE>; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:57:09 +0100; Hello Pete When will ver 5.1 Journal Sevice be out? Does it require ver 5.1 of TSM Server as well or does it work with 4.2.1? How do I disable logging to jbberror.log? On some servers it gets very bi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00619.html (12,035 bytes)
10. ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: Pete Tanenhaus [mailto:tanenhau AT US.IBM DOT COM]=20; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:13:40 -0500; Answers/Comments to questions...... Client"=20 also needed Agreed. I am working on developing a redbook with guidelines for understanding and deploying Journal Based Backup. objects This is an ideal; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00620.html (20,248 bytes)
11. Re: ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: Pete Tanenhaus <tanenhau AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:31:02 -0500; Answers and comments to questions ..... Tentative GA for 5.1 client is beginning of second quarter of this year. There is a formal beta program, if you are interested contact me offline and I will pr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00664.html (13,416 bytes)
12. ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: Pete Tanenhaus [mailto:tanenhau AT US.IBM DOT COM]; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:13:40 -0500; Answers/Comments to questions...... " also needed Agreed. I am working on developing a redbook with guidelines for understanding and deploying Journal Based Backup. objects This is an ideal environme; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00665.html (20,133 bytes)
13. Re: ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...*** (score: 1): Author: Pete Tanenhaus <tanenhau AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:37:14 -0500; view to To some extent this is true but the point I was trying to make was that building the local list of objects by scanning the entire local filesystem has proven to be a much bigger performance; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-01/msg00673.html (15,721 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]