Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:31:12 -0400
Hi, I have a specific saveset (/home at 330 GB) that I would like to recover. Actually, I'm trying to recover several specific pathnames: /home/dir1/dir2/desired_dir1 /home/dir1/dir2/desired_dir2 /ho
Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:11:07 -0400
The data I need to recover is beyond the browse period so nwrecover is no good. I thought that the 'recover' command was just the command line version of nwrecover in which case it's likewise useless
Author: Davina Treiber <treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:13:47 -0400
recover is the command line version, but it includes the -S option, for save set recoveries, if that helps. What are you really trying to achieve? Would you prefer a standard recovery if only your sa
Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:52:17 -0400
This seems like a slick idea, and if it works, this would be exactly what I'd like to do so as to avoid having to read through the entire parent saveset (file system) to get what I want, but I've nev
Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:59:42 -0400
One thing about this business of mergin in an old index. Will the current browse policy on the affected client's index affect this? Do I need to change this? Currently, it's set to 1 month, and I nee
recover [-f] [-n] [-u] [-q] [-i {nNyYrR}] [-d destination] -s server -S ssid[/cloneid] [-S ssid[/cloneid]]. . . [path]. . . S ssid[/cloneid] Specifies save set recover mode and can only be used by ro
Author: Davina Treiber <Treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:38:15 +0100
George Sinclair wrote: This seems like a slick idea, and if it works, this would be exactly what I'd like to do so as to avoid having to read through the entire parent saveset (file system) to get wh
Author: Davina Treiber <Treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:43:24 +0100
George Sinclair wrote: One thing about this business of mergin in an old index. Will the current browse policy on the affected client's index affect this? Do I need to change this? Currently, it's se
Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:01:27 -0400
Just out of curiousity, how do you change savsets from recycable to recoverable? In my case, it's moot because they're still recoverable buy was just curious. Also, any idea on how long the nsrck com
Author: Davina Treiber <Treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 07:47:40 +0100
nsrmm -o notrecyclable -S ssid Also, any idea on how long the nsrck command might take to run? The size of the last full for this client index on 08/31/03 was 184 MB. The size of the index that I wan
Author: Vandecruys Kris <Kris.Vandecruys AT NBB DOT BE>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:05:49 +0200
Davina, I beg to differ. I jsut restored an index of 147Mb, which was a matter of seconds once the tape was mounted. the merging of the index however (and with that the runtime of nsrck) took me ove