1. Please help support our sponsors by considering their products and services.
    Our sponsors enable us to maintain high-speed Internet connection and fast webservers.
    They support this free information and knowledge exchange forum service at no cost to you.

    Please welcome our latest sponsor Tectrade . We can show our appreciation by learning more about Tectrade Solutions

Container Pool size recommendation

Discussion in 'Capacity Planning' started by ch_wira, Jan 10, 2017.

  1. ch_wira

    ch_wira ADSM.ORG Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Service Manager
    Location:
    Thailand
    Hi,
    I have a plan to upgrade TSM server to be 8.1 and using container pool instead of VTL & Disk base. Any idea if I plan create only one container pool (1 PB raw capacity)? My objective is high deduplication ratio expected.
     
  2.  
  3. Trident

    Trident TSM noob with 10 years expirience ADSM.ORG Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    34
    Occupation:
    IT operations
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
  4. ch_wira

    ch_wira ADSM.ORG Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Service Manager
    Location:
    Thailand
    Hi,
    Thanks you. By the way what's about the big one size of container pool. Anyone can share pros and cons. I found only one factor is the protect pool will perform a whole pool cannot select specific data. Is there any performance impact?
     
  5. Trident

    Trident TSM noob with 10 years expirience ADSM.ORG Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    34
    Occupation:
    IT operations
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    The size of each stgpooldirectory is something to consider. How many luns/paths can you handle?
    What happens if you loose one or more luns (for whatever reason)? The time to recover it can be interessting. And the db2 queries to put extenst to damaged/destroyed is a big operation.
    A big dedup pool will demand a lot from your DB2 part. Can your system handle it? The layout of db luns and log luns is becoming more impoortant.

    Just some thoughts from my side.
     
  6. marclant

    marclant ADSM.ORG Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,607
    Likes Received:
    370
    Occupation:
    Accelerated Value Specialist for Spectrum Protect
    Location:
    Canada
    Triden brought up a lot of good points.

    I recommend you stick to the BluePrint: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/... Manager/page/IBM Spectrum Protect Blueprints

    As well at Config Best practices from the manual: http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEQVQ_8.1.0/perf/t_optim_config.html
     
  7. ch_wira

    ch_wira ADSM.ORG Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Service Manager
    Location:
    Thailand
    I have reviewed the BluePrint & Config Best practices as marclant's recommendation but not found any related to storage pool size.

    As Triden points.
    - How many luns/paths can you handle?
    If this related to the number of folder/files filesystem limitation. I agree to split them to more filesystems but what's about big one storage pool because we can add more LUNs (filesystems) to a single storage pool.

    - A big dedup pool will demand a lot from your DB2 part.
    Can you share that why DB2 require more resource if the storage pool is big? Is it related to deduplication table in DB2 that contains the meta data?
     
  8. marclant

    marclant ADSM.ORG Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,607
    Likes Received:
    370
    Occupation:
    Accelerated Value Specialist for Spectrum Protect
    Location:
    Canada

Share This Page