1. Forum Rules (PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ BEFORE POSTING) Click the link to access ADSM.ORG Acceptable Use Policy and forum rules which should be observed when using this website. Violators may be banned from this website. This message will disappear after you have made at least 12 posts. Thank you for your cooperation.

confused about size of a node

Discussion in 'Command Line Administrator Client' started by kongfranon, Jun 18, 2012.

  1. kongfranon

    kongfranon New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am not sure which section to post this so hopefully this is ok.

    So I have a linux host that is currently using 2.4 TB. I am backing it up for the first time on my new TSM server.

    I am confused about statistics, I started the backup last night @ around 8 pm, and it is still running now so far backup is taking 16hours+:

    Sess Comm. Sess Wait Bytes Bytes Sess Platform Client Name
    Number Method State Time Sent Recvd Type
    ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------------
    2,617 Tcp/Ip RecvW 0 S 14.6 K 5.2 T Node Linux NSRV01
    x86-64

    Since last night it says it sent 5.2 TB is that correct?

    I don't see how that is possible since it is 2.4 TB?

    I just ran an audit licenses command and then see the following when I type q auditocc:


    Node Name Backup Archive Space-Managed Total
    Storage Storage Storage Used Storage
    Used (MB) Used (MB) (MB) Used (MB)
    ----------------------------------- --------- --------- ------------- ---------

    NSRV01 228,098 0 0 228,098


    and now when I run q filespace:


    Node Name Filespace FSID Platform Filespace Is Files- Capacity Pct
    Name Type pace Util
    Unicode?
    --------------- ----------- ---- -------- --------- --------- ----------- -----
    NSRV01 /vm1fs2 1 Linux EXT4 No 1,098 GB 16.3
    x86-64
    NSRV01 / 2 Linux EXT4 No 62,365 MB 10.7
    x86-64
    NSRV01 /boot 3 Linux EXT4 No 484 MB 17.9
    x86-64
    NSRV01 /offieo- 4 Linux EXT4 No 1,000 GB 5.1
    dnfs x86-64
    NSRV01 /dbnfs 5 Linux EXT4 No 4,317 GB 50.6


    so in theory maximum size of server is roughly 5.4 TB but only 2.4 TB is being used at the moment.


    Does any of this make sense? Why would it backup 5 TB when only using 2.4? and then when I run auditocc it shows only 230 GB ?


    Am I interpreting this correct?

    Thanks
     
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2012
  2.  
  3. Trident

    Trident Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    27
    Occupation:
    IT operations
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    Hi,

    Do you have any open files, like mysql or similar? The number 5.2tb is bytes transferred, not backed up. Look in the error log for clues.
     
  4. kongfranon

    kongfranon New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh ok thanks! No this server is just exports of oracle backups, no live db files

    This is what I see over and over


    06/15/2012 15:32:49 ANS9020E Could not establish a session with a TSM server or client agent. The TSM return code is -53.
    06/15/2012 15:32:49 ANS1029E Communication with the TSM server is lost.
     
  5. kongfranon

    kongfranon New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0

    Thanks that is all verified, and if i run dsmc at the command line it logs in correct and can run commands like q filespace or incr. If those were set in correct I would think I would not be able to do that from the client right?
     
  6. smajl

    smajl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Brno
    since I see in list of filespaces /vmwarenfs2 /devdbnfs I assume there 2 filesystems contains NFS shares with files opened by some clients/applications.
    dsmc backup up those files but if file is changed during processing it tries to backup them again. see parameter chaingingretries 0-3 in dsm.sys or specification of copygroup. q se counts sum of transferred bytes even for incompletly saved files.
     
  7. kongfranon

    kongfranon New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    That makes sense...I will take a look in the mean time I have opened a ticket with IBM, they keep thinking it a network issue, I did every single test I can think of transferring files directly outside of TSM and had no issues at all. I looked at the cisco switch ports, no errors or mis config with duplex / speed

    I am still waiting to hear back from them.
     
  8. smajl

    smajl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Brno
    you should see something like this in dsmsched.log:
    06/20/12 14:27:44 Normal File--> 576,229,376 /data/mail/filename.nsf Changed
    06/20/12 14:29:45 Retry # 1 Normal File--> 576,229,376 /data/mail/filename.nsf Changed
    06/20/12 14:33:50 Retry # 2 Normal File--> 576,229,376 /data/mail/filename.nsf Changed
    06/20/12 14:39:03 Retry # 3 Normal File--> 576,229,376 /data/mail/filename.nsf Sent

    This would cause in summary Backed up data ~550GB but Transferred data ~1.5TB (depends on activity). This is normal behavior.

    If during "send to tsm" operation file is changed (by OS/DB/app...) this change is being detected by TSM client and it tried to re-send it again (whole file). This repeats until file is successfully backed up (=no change in file during backup) or changingretries is reached and file si reported as "Failed"
     
  9. kongfranon

    kongfranon New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Finally got it working where it it completes the backup in 6 hours instead of 18+...it was vmware that was changing the vmdk files. The vmware admin changed some settings on his side, and now no more changed vmdk files.

    Thanks everyone for the help
     
  10. kongfranon

    kongfranon New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have another question related to a different node...and I realized my original question never got answered since we got sidetracked.

    So I have an oracle db server now that shows 3 TB in the auditocc and then in the filespace shows different. I really don't know which one to go by? It doesn't make sense to me that it has 3 TB, when the server does not have that much space?


    Node Name Filespace FSID Platform Filespace Is Files- Capacity Pct
    Name Type pace Util
    Unicode?
    --------------- ----------- ---- -------- --------- --------- ----------- -----
    DB01 /mnt/raid1 1 Linux EXT3 No 492 GB 69.9
    x86-64
    DB01 / 2 Linux EXT3 No 19,838 MB 75.0
    x86-64
    DB01 /a1_01 3 Linux EXT3 No 59,515 MB 27.2
    x86-64
    DB01 /opt 4 Linux EXT3 No 19,838 MB 38.6
    x86-64
    DB01 /boot 5 Linux EXT3 No 493 MB 11.1
    x86-64

    tsm: BACKUP02>q auditocc qadb01
    License information as of last audit on 07/02/2012 at 08:00:02 AM.

    Node Name Backup Archive Space-Managed Total
    Storage Storage Storage Used Storage
    Used (MB) Used (MB) (MB) Used (MB)
    ----------------------------------- --------- --------- ------------- ---------
    DB01 3,077,994 0 0 3,077,994



    Maybe the better question is what is difference between auditocc and filespace when it shows size? Since they don't seem to match up?
     
  11. rmazzon

    rmazzon Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    17
    Occupation:
    TSM Managed Services Lead
    Location:
    NC
    The filespace table (q filespace comamnd) shows the drive/file system information of the client. The q auditoccupancy commands returns the amount of backup data being managed for that client by the TSM server. Your occupancy should always be larger than the sum of the filespace sizes (capacity*pct_util/100) under most circumstances. I am ignore the effects of deduplication.

    Use the q auditocc command, or the occupancy table itself to determine how much data you are managing for any node.
     
    kongfranon likes this.

Share This Page