1. Forum Rules (PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ BEFORE POSTING) Click the link to access ADSM.ORG Acceptable Use Policy and forum rules which should be observed when using this website. Violators may be banned from this website. This message will disappear after you have made at least 12 posts. Thank you for your cooperation.

Backed up file with multiple management classes

Discussion in 'Backup / Archive Discussion' started by gshiman, Nov 30, 2012.

  1. gshiman

    gshiman New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    The fragment at the bottom from IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Windows Version 5.5 seems to suggest that multiple management classes can be in effect for the same file. Consider that file is backed up using management class ClassX (with backup copy group and no archive copy group) and archived using a different one - ClassY (with archive copy group, but no backup copy group). If then include option is used to specify ClassX for backup operation on a file and include.archive option is used to specify ClassY for archiving of the same file, then the file ends up having both th ese management class, with ClassX used for backups and ClassY - for archiving.

    I assume it is also possible for HSM operation on the same file to use yet another management class - ClassZ, for example when default management class doesn't have backup nor archive copy group, but does define storage pool for HSM operations.

    In that case CLASS_NAME of ClassX for the file will be recorded in BACKUPS table, and CLASS_NAME of ClassY - in ARCHIVES table and ClassZ - in SPACEMGFILE table.

    Can somebody please confirm if my reading is correct?

    Thanks in advance,
    George

    A management class specified with a simple include option can apply to one or
    more processes on the client. More specific include options (such as
    include.archive) allow the user to specify different management classes. Some
    examples of how this works:
    v If a client backs up, archives, and migrates a file to the same server, and uses
    only a single include option, the management class specified for the file applies
    to all three operations (backup, archive, and migrate).
    v If a client backs up and archives a file to one server, and migrates the file to a
    different server, the client can specify one management class for the file for
    backup and archive operations, and a different management class for migrating.
    v Clients at Version 4.2 or later can specify a management class for archiving that
    is different from the management class for backup.
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2012
  2.  
  3. hogmaster

    hogmaster Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2002
    Messages:
    519
    Likes Received:
    20
    Occupation:
    Storage engineer
    Yes you are correct
    a backup is independent of the archive in everey respect even down to mgmgt class.
    The archive is completely independent of the management class used for backup. This is true for HSM as well.
     
  4. gshiman

    gshiman New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you for feedback.

    I take it that you agree that unique management class can also be configured for space management operations and that a given file or directory may have up to three management classes when its management classes differ for backup, archiving and data management operations on that file/directory.

    May I ask a follow up question:
    Is management class unique per TSM server or per policy domain? From what I gather from some fragments here and there it is unique per TSM server.

    - George
     
  5. smajl

    smajl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Brno
    Even on lower level...
    You can have management class with exactly the same name and settings in many policy sets, i.e. in every policy set, every policy domain, every TSM server.
    Only one policy set can be active for each Domain anyway.
     

Share This Page