Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.3: bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo() for x.x.x.x failed, Unknown error 18446744073709551614 (-2)

2012-09-04 13:45:45
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.3: bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo() for x.x.x.x failed, Unknown error 18446744073709551614 (-2)
From: William Brown <william.d.brown AT gsk DOT com>
To: "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu" <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 17:45:32 +0000
Interested to know what you did when " DNS administrator removed the reverse 
lookup zones ".

Did you ask them to reinstate the reverse lookup, or reconfigure NetBackup to 
no longer require it, or what?   I ask because occasionally we have discussions 
about this, and have a few environments without reverse lookup - as they are 
non-production we use hosts files, but I just wonder what 'most' people do.

William D L Brown

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Michael 
Graff Andersen
Sent: 04 September 2012 13:55
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.3: bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo() for 
x.x.x.x failed, Unknown error 18446744073709551614 (-2)

Hello Justin

I have seen the same thing on Netbackup 7.1.0.2 after our DNS administrator 
removed the reverse lookup zones

Took a day or two after the change before the vnet entries appeared in the 
problems log.

I would try to run bpclntcmd -clear_host_cache first

Regards
Michael

2012/9/4 Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>:
> Hello,
>
> Upgraded from 7.1 to 7.5.0.3 (7.1->7.5->7.5.0.3).
>
> During a regular hot catalog backup I saw this:
> 1346454000 1 2 16 master 0 0 0 *NULL* bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo()
> for x.x.x.x failed, Unknown error 18446744073709551614 (-2)
> 1346540401 1 2 16 master  0 0 0 *NULL* bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo()
> for x.x.x.x failed, Unknown error 18446744073709551614 (-2)
>
> Everything had been running for several days without a single problem,
> this happened recently, also the test environment running for 5-6+
> months has never had this problem.
>
> I opened a case with Symantec but was curious if anyone had seen this before?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Justin.
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


________________________________

This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited
(registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a
member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The
registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited
is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu